Hi all - I'm using the Robert's eSearch widget v. 3.6.8. I have a feature class with a joined table. Whenever I use the eSearch widget the maximum number of records (n=1000) is returned as if it's selecting everything in the feature class. I know it should only return 3 records based on my search criteria. The field names in the .xml are set correctly based on the REST service between the two tables: * Special_Status_Plants_info.SCI_NAME ( type: esriFieldTypeString , alias: SCI_NAME , length: 64 ) * Special_Status_Plants.PARK_CODE ( type: esriFieldTypeString , alias: PARK_CODE , length: 8 ) The only difference between this feature class and others that are working correctly in the same service is the join. Any ideas if this is a bug? I'm having trouble navigating the GeoNet site to look around.... And actually - anyone have a beginners guide to how to even use the GeoNet site!? Many thanks, Meg

Hi Robert - Any chance I can send you the feature class? Thanks again.

The feature class has nothing unusual about it – no subtypes, domains, raster etc. Can I send you a subset of data in the file geodatabase via dropbox? Thanks as always. 2021-06-08_15h38_08.png

nav[aria-label="Primary Navigation"] { padding: 0; & ul { list-style: none; width: 100%; display: flex; flex-direction: row; justify-content: start; align-items: start; gap: 30px; padding: 0; & li { margin: 0; } & ul li { list-style: none; } } }

eSearch (3.6.8) joined table on FClass always returns max # records

MegPeterson

Hi all -

I'm using the Robert's eSearch widget v. 3.6.8.

I have a feature class with a joined table. Whenever I use the eSearch widget the maximum number of records (n=1000) is returned as if it's selecting everything in the feature class. I know it should only return 3 records based on my search criteria.

The field names in the .xml are set correctly based on the REST service between the two tables:

Special_Status_Plants_info.SCI_NAME ( type: esriFieldTypeString , alias: SCI_NAME , length: 64 )
Special_Status_Plants.PARK_CODE ( type: esriFieldTypeString , alias: PARK_CODE , length: 8 )

The only difference between this feature class and others that are working correctly in the same service is the join.

Any ideas if this is a bug? I'm having trouble navigating the GeoNet site to look around.... And actually - anyone have a beginners guide to how to even use the GeoNet site!?

Many thanks,

Meg

Finde mehr Beiträge mit dem Tag

Accepted answers

All comments

RobertScheitlin__GISP

Meg,

Does your layer or your table have a subtype?

MegPeterson

No it doesn't. It's a many-to-one join, if that sheds light on anything.

Thanks for the prompt response.

RobertScheitlin__GISP

Meg,

I have seen this before but I thought that it was associated with a subtype... Can you test your query in the Rest Service Directory page for your layer and see how many results are returned?

MegPeterson

Hi Robert -

I was able to query in REST with a record return = 12. I've attached the screen shot of one of the records so you can see if any Field names trigger thoughts.

Many thanks.

Nimm an der Diskussion teil

Angemeldete Mitglieder können Beiträge verfassen, Updates folgen und mehr. Neu hier? Registriere ein kostenloses Konto.

Schnellzugriffe

Community Help
Find useful guides, FAQs, and documents to help you navigate and make the most of Esri Community.