Enterprise UN vs FGDB

DLee

Hallo,

Wir verwalten ein kleines kommunales Stromnetz mit Utility Network (UN) Version 4 auf Enterprise Geodatabase 10.8. Ohne unmittelbare Upgrade-Pläne habe ich erfolgreich eine lokale file geodatabase mit einem Asset-Paket und UN Version 7 erstellt. Ich bewerte nun, ob ich die Entwicklung weiterhin in der Enterprise-Umgebung fortsetzen oder zur lokalen file geodatabase wechseln soll. Ist die Unterstützung mehrerer Benutzer der Hauptvorteil des Enterprise Utility Network, oder gibt es noch andere bedeutende Vorteile?

Danke!

GIS_kiwi4

@DLee - supporting multiple users is a one of the advantage of using Enterprise Geodatabase. 
Other advantages include - archiving, versioning, historical views. 

The key one in my opinion is being able to publish a UN service/services that can be used across the business - maps, apps, ExB, reporting etc. WebGIS is very important to us because not all people feel comfortable using ArcGIS Pro. We also use these services for automations and other ETL processes. 

But I understand that the organization size can be a slight limitation.
You can go down that localGDB route If you can somehow manage packaging of maps and sharing those with the users. Not sure if you are considering a "central" localgdb that all projects point to?

You will have to be able to co-ordinate edit sessions if you have multiple editors. 

You could possibly have a combination of localGDB and AGOL for webmaps without tracing, etc. 

It's not a simple answer unfortunately and depends on your use case and business goals. Happy to bounce ideas if required.