<\/P>
Ich schaue mir die Attributtabelle der Webanwendung an, die auf unserer Hub-Seite angezeigt wird: https:\/\/ak-lsli-adec.hub.arcgis.com<\/A><\/P>Am unteren Rand der Seite befindet sich unser Lead Service Line Public Viewer - Web Mapping Application. Direktlink: https:\/\/adec.maps.arcgis.com\/apps\/webappviewer\/index.html?id=ce4c212eea604b6d9cff1a2f24fc8531<\/A><\/P>In der Attributtabelle der Anwendung haben die Felder Utility Status und Customer Status zwei Einträge in einer Zelle: Lead I Non-Lead, Lead I Lead, etc... <\/STRONG>Die Symbolik ist in der Karte korrekt, aber die Attributfelder sind es nicht. <\/P>Die Webkarte, die zur Erstellung der App verwendet wurde: Lead Service Line Public Viewer https:\/\/adec.maps.arcgis.com\/home\/item.html?id=f8ae7a2c4b2c4ac9a086c59da2f7d29d<\/A> enthält die korrekten Informationen im Attribut (ein Eintrag pro Zelle)Ich verstehe, dass eine Art Ausdruck verwendet wird, aber ich bin mir nicht sicher, wo dieser sich befindet. In den bereitgestellten Screenshots verstehe ich nicht, warum der Utility Status angezeigt wird als- Non-Lead I Lead<\/STRONG><\/U><\/P>Wir haben einige Änderungen an der ursprünglichen Lösung vorgenommen, daher hoffe ich, dass wir den Arcade-Ausdruck hinter den Kulissen nicht durcheinandergebracht haben. Wie kann ich erreichen, dass die Felder Utility Status und Customer Status das anzeigen, was im Service Line Public Viewer (Webkarte) eingegeben wurde? <\/P> <\/P><\/span><\/P><\/P><\/span><\/P><\/P><\/P><\/P>
Am unteren Rand der Seite befindet sich unser Lead Service Line Public Viewer - Web Mapping Application. Direktlink:
In der Attributtabelle der Anwendung haben die Felder Utility Status und Customer Status zwei Einträge in einer Zelle: Lead I Non-Lead, Lead I Lead, etc... <\/STRONG>Die Symbolik ist in der Karte korrekt, aber die Attributfelder sind es nicht. <\/P>Die Webkarte, die zur Erstellung der App verwendet wurde: Lead Service Line Public Viewer
Hi Chris,
Thank you for bringing this to our attention. That is happening because of the complex symbology (the split point using multiple attributes) of the service when it was published from Pro during development. Even though the Public map doesn't use the split point, the underlying feature service view (ServiceLine_viewing) does.
I have a fix, but I highly suggest testing it in a test environment as it will involve renaming edit templates, which I know from experience can be fragile. Also, only do this in ServiceLine_viewing and not the other services/views. Please follow the steps below:
Ensure this change did not negatively impact any of the other items using ServiceLine_viewing:
I have checked on my end and I don't see any negative impacts on the out-of-box solution, but you have made customizations which I cannot test.
Hope this helps!
Alex
The solution didn't work for me. The only difference was that I had to create the view layer myself because the original one had been deleted. The symbology was correct before I made the template changes, but afterward, they turned black. Do you have any other ideas? Thank you!
Brant,
I totally know where you're coming from. I rolled the dice on this particular issue and did it in production. It worked fine. This time. It's never been clear to me how to implement changes in a test environment. Sometimes creating a copy of the feature classes works but in a complex solution like this, I eventually decided to deploy a separate test solution. It's not perfect because we've made a lot of customizations in our production solution, but it does help us document the default settings in case we run into trouble with our customizations.
Hi @AlexKabak, I'm dealing with a similar problem to Chris's here (" | Lead" is appended to all utilstatus types). Except that the behaviour is showing up only in the Field Maps app for the ServiceLine_editing layer. It seems like the source of the issue might be the same, so I'm considering the steps you provided in Map Viewer Classic. However, since we're using ArcGIS Online, I don't really have a test environment to try it in first. Do you have any other suggestions for testing?
Further, are there any other ways to edit the "fragile" templates than Map Viewer Classic? Would recreating the editing view pontentially set the templates back to the original state?
-Brant
Worked perfectly! Thank you.
Thanks Alex, I'll give this a try. I guess I'm happy to find out that it wasn't something I did when customizing the solution. 😀
--Chris
Angemeldete Mitglieder können Beiträge verfassen, Updates folgen und mehr. Neu hier? Registriere ein kostenloses Konto.
Find useful guides, FAQs, and documents to help you navigate and make the most of Esri Community.