nav[aria-label="Primary Navigation"] { padding: 0; & ul { list-style: none; width: 100%; display: flex; flex-direction: row; justify-content: start; align-items: start; gap: 30px; padding: 0; & li { margin: 0; } & ul li { list-style: none; } } }

Raster creation help

TimJackson

I apologise if this has been answered before, as it seem like quite a basic question but I couldnt find a solution. (9.3, ArcView license with spatial analyst and 3D analyst).

I am trying to calculate the volume of water that would be impounded by a hypothetical dam using cut/fill, and I am having trouble creating the "after" raster.

I have an elevation raster (Ras1) and a polygon of the surface of the potential reservoir formed by the dam and a 450m contour.
I used "extract by mask" to create a raster of the reservoir and reclassified this to a constant 450m (Ras2).
I am now trying to create a raster (Ras3) that is identical to Ras1 apart from the area covered by Ras2, which should take the Ras2 values (450)

I have tried using raster calculator an con([Ras1] > 0, [Ras1], [Ras2]) but the output is identical to Ras2, with no data from Ras1.

Where am I going wrong with this? and is this even a sensible method?

Once I have Ras3 I am assuming cut/fill with Ras1 as "before" and Ras3 as "after" will give me the volume

I have found the volume using TIN polygon volume already but I want to compare it with the cut/fill method

Thanks
Tim

Finde mehr Beiträge mit dem Tag

Accepted answers

XanderBakker

I have an elevation raster (Ras1) and a polygon of the surface of the potential reservoir formed by the dam and a 450m contour.
I used "extract by mask" to create a raster of the reservoir and reclassified this to a constant 450m (Ras2).
I am now trying to create a raster (Ras3) that is identical to Ras1 apart from the area covered by Ras2, which should take the Ras2 values (450)

I have tried using raster calculator an con([Ras1] > 0, [Ras1], [Ras2]) but the output is identical to Ras2, with no data from Ras1.

Where am I going wrong with this? and is this even a sensible method?

Hi Tim,

When using a formula in Spatial Analyst, you should take special care about the NoData values. Normally combining a value with a NoData value results in NoData.

To avoid this try the following formula:

Con ( IsNull ( [Ras2] ) , [Ras1] , [Ras2] )

In this case it detects the NoData values and returns the values from [Ras1], other areas will be filled with the data from [Ras2].

Further reading in 9.3:
http://webhelp.esri.com/arcgisdesktop/9.3/index.cfm?TopicName=Is_Null
http://webhelp.esri.com/arcgisdesktop/9.3/index.cfm?TopicName=NoData_and_how_it_affects_analysis

Kind regards,

Xander

All comments

XanderBakker

I have an elevation raster (Ras1) and a polygon of the surface of the potential reservoir formed by the dam and a 450m contour.
I used "extract by mask" to create a raster of the reservoir and reclassified this to a constant 450m (Ras2).
I am now trying to create a raster (Ras3) that is identical to Ras1 apart from the area covered by Ras2, which should take the Ras2 values (450)

I have tried using raster calculator an con([Ras1] > 0, [Ras1], [Ras2]) but the output is identical to Ras2, with no data from Ras1.

Where am I going wrong with this? and is this even a sensible method?

Con ( IsNull ( [Ras2] ) , [Ras1] , [Ras2] )

TimJackson

Thank you Xander, this worked perfectly
Tim

curtvprice

10.x help links:

Nimm an der Diskussion teil

Angemeldete Mitglieder können Beiträge verfassen, Updates folgen und mehr. Neu hier? Registriere ein kostenloses Konto.

Schnellzugriffe

Community Help
Find useful guides, FAQs, and documents to help you navigate and make the most of Esri Community.