nav[aria-label="Primary Navigation"] { padding: 0; & ul { list-style: none; width: 100%; display: flex; flex-direction: row; justify-content: start; align-items: start; gap: 30px; padding: 0; & li { margin: 0; } & ul li { list-style: none; } } }

CHYBA 003856:* Maximální hodnota domény překračuje velikost bitu atributu sítě při aplikaci balíčku aktiv

CharlotteMatthew

Dobrý den týme,

Při načítání balíčku elektrických aktiv dostáváme následující chybu po úplném nasazení Utility Network:

*CHYBA 003856:* Maximální hodnota domény překračuje velikost bitu atributu sítě.

P.S. Zkontrolovali jsme dostupné články, které uvádějí důvod, avšak nejsme schopni rozluštit, ke kterému konkrétnímu atributu se problém vztahuje

Mohli byste nám laskavě poskytnout svůj názor na tento problém a navrhnout možné řešení?

@RobertKrisher @RemiMyers

Najděte více příspěvků označených jako

Accepted answers

RobertKrisher

What I'm saying is that you didn't need to extend the domain, you should have use the existing domain and values, just update the descriptions to match the customers data. I have already provided a proposal of how you could have mapped their values to the original values. You should be able to incorporate that into your data migration going forward, and if you need to fix it right now you can adjust the data and schema in the asset package to make the correction.

You can see the bitsize in the network properties. Because you are using an asset package to build your utility network, refer to their documentation for hot to control the size of an inline attribute: Utility Network Package_Asset Package Reference.pdf

All comments

RobertKrisher

Can you show a screenshot of all your network attributes? along with the full attributes of one of the features that has this error?

CharlotteMatthew

Hello @RobertKrisher @RemiMyers

Thanks for looking into this. I’ve shared the Asset Package and the Network Attribute screenshot. Also, I’m not seeing any error tied to a specific feature class or attribute — the message is pretty generic overall.

Cheers,
Charlotte

TestDemo.gdb.zip

NetworkContribute.png

RobertKrisher

The domain you have configured to set the bitsize of your phasesenergized domain (Electric_Phase_Attribution_All) only allows for 3 bits (max value = 7)

The domains you have assigned to your features appear to have a maximum value of 14, which requires 4 bits.

Furthermore, it looks like you just added RYB values onto the end of the domain instead of using the existing coded values and renaming the descriptions. This is important, because the way you have done this does not allow for the bitwise combination of the different phases, which will result in phase propagation not working correctly.

It looks like RYB = ABC, and my guess is if you look at the original coded values in your source data you will see that the integer values from your original domain matched (R=4, Y=2, B=1, and RYB=7).

After inspecting your data, it appears that you should have just mapped your phasing values to the existing domain values instead of extending the domain.

CharlotteMatthew

Hey @RobertKrisher

Thanks for your observation

But how am I suppose to know what is the bit size of the specific domain if we do not have access to source data .

Also if there is a way to check inline bit size and how to edit that and make modifications about it.

Cheers,

Charlotte

RobertKrisher

Připojte se ke konverzaci

Přihlášení členové mohou přispívat, sledovat aktualizace a další. Jste tu noví? Zaregistrujte si bezplatný účet.

Rychlé odkazy

Community Help
Find useful guides, FAQs, and documents to help you navigate and make the most of Esri Community.