nav[aria-label="Primary Navigation"] { padding: 0; & ul { list-style: none; width: 100%; display: flex; flex-direction: row; justify-content: start; align-items: start; gap: 30px; padding: 0; & li { margin: 0; } & ul li { list-style: none; } } }

Geocoding help

BrianBulla

Hi,

Just looking for some clarification on how geocoding works in Pro. I have created a Geocoder based on a point layer of address points. It seems to be working as desired when I type addresses into the 'Locate' window. But when I use the same locator in the Geocode Addresses Geoprocessing tool, the exact same address that I type in the Locate window comes up as 'U' - unmatched.

All of my settings in the Geocoder are set to default. All I did was specify which fields to use for Number, Road Type, etc.

Also, the list of addresses I am geocoding is actually the table of addresses that make up the point layer the geocoder is based on. So I would think I would get a 100% match rate, but I am not.

Any advice on how to tweak my geocoder is appreciated.

Thanks!

Najděte více příspěvků označených jako

Accepted answers

All comments

BrianBulla

Hi Shana,

Sorry for the delayed response. This is my first day back in the office since attending the Dev Summit. I have attached the locator.

ADDR_Durham_CreateAddressLoc.loc.zip

ADDR_Durham_CreateAddressLoc.lox.zip

ADDR_Durham_CreateAddressLoc.loc.xml.zip

Shana Britt

Brian,

It would be more helpful if you could provide the locator you created or a screen shot of the Durham locator properties Reference data tables page like the one below and the 'About the locator' page from the properties. You could create a locator package if you wanted to share it here or send it to me in private message.

Shana Britt

Joe, The Match without zone property is the same for Pro. The US Address and General styles are essentially the same in Pro as in ArcMap. There may be times where the Pro version of the style template might be more current than the style included with ArcMap because of the development and release cycle of Pro.

BrianBulla

No. I am using a single field with the street address and the city name. It is a custom geocoder based on address points that are local to us. I would expect to get a 100% match since the addresses I am trying to geocode are exactly the same as those the geocoder is based on.

BrianBulla

Hi Shana,

The table is just a table (.xls to be exact), so there is no 'Shape' field. The screenshot below shows you my settings for the Geocoder.

After tweaking the settings I was able to get a much better match score, but there were always a few that would never match. I have circled one of the addresses that would never match. As you can see in the next screenshot, the address that won't geocode through the 'Geocode Addresses' tool can be found when using the 'Locate', both using the same geocoder.

JoeBorgione

I haven't yet worked in pro; just wondering if the default settings in it include MATCH WITHOUT ZONE = FALSE like in ArcGIS desktop 10.5.1.

Brian Bulla, does your data include city, zip and state?

Shana Britt

Brian:

Are you able to share a screenshot of the table you used as input in the Geocode Addresses tool or the address locator?

If the table contains the 'Shape' field it should be removed from the table. The street address (380 new york street) should also be in a single field and city, state, zip in their own respective fields or the full address (380 new york st, redlands, ca) in a single field in the table.

-Shana

Připojte se k diskusi

Přihlášení členové mohou přispívat, sledovat aktualizace a další. Jste tu noví? Zaregistrujte si bezplatný účet.

Rychlé odkazy

Community Help
Find useful guides, FAQs, and documents to help you navigate and make the most of Esri Community.