Our City code says that the buffer should be 500' not including rights of way. I can't think of a way to standardize this.
A few questions to help clarify the issue:
Our city uses a parcel layer for public notifications that has all the ROW stripped out prior to running the buffers. However, that said, I've noticed other municipalities have a different combination of data and process. So I guess solving this comes down to "what have you got to work with" and then "how do you want to get there given what is available."
Chris Donohue, GISP
Thanks Chris.
I'm not really sure how that could be done aside from just estimation. Is it possible to configure the buffer tool to account for ROW?
My very first thought would be to do it the way you said you did it in the past. I.e,. buffer the selected polygon 500 feet and then find all the parcels that intersect that. With this process the intersected ones would become the ones you need to notify.
But after re-reading your question I think what is going on is that you are saying the selected parcel needs to be buffered 500' and that distance needs to exclude from the measurement any ROW traversed as part of the 500 foot distance part. In other words, going away from the selected parcel we start to measure across parcels but whenever we traverse a ROW we stop increasing the measurement and only continue it once we are traversing parcels again. So a parcel 590 feet away from your selected parcel would be notified it in the traverse to it a 100 foot ROW was crossed (which does not count towards the 500 ft notification distance). In short, it is not a simple 500 foot buffer to solve this. So the goal will be to find a process that measures 500 feet out from a polygon to find all other non-ROW polygons by intentionally excluding from the 500ft distance any ROW polygons crossed.
Can you confirm if I theorized this correctly? If this is the case I don't immediately know the answer to this, but am sure with the talent on GeoNet we can find a solution. Let me know if I got the issue correct and/or if there is another aspect to it.
Some ideas:
ESRI Local Government Information Model Public Notification Tool. I have not used this, but it may be worth looking into.
http://solutions.arcgis.com/local-government/help/public-notification/
If the goal is indeed to traverse 500 feet out only accumulating distance across parcels (ie the distance across ROW does not count), I'll throw out some preliminary workflow ideas (untested) on how it may be possible to solve that. Note that these will need to be fleshed out a bit and they would be an interesting challenge for someone to implement (i.e. not a simple solution quickly done):
http://pro.arcgis.com/en/pro-app/tool-reference/analysis/near.htm
http://pro.arcgis.com/en/pro-app/tool-reference/analysis/generate-near-table.htm
http://pro.arcgis.com/en/pro-app/tool-reference/analysis/erase.htm
Yes Chris, you got it correct. It's not so hard when the ROW is parallel to the property. You could just add the width of the ROW to the buffer. But most of the time roads intersect the buffer at different angles and may not be a uniform width.
Thank you for your suggestions below! I'm starting to think of the problem in new ways.
Cindy
Přihlášení členové mohou přispívat, sledovat aktualizace a další. Jste tu noví? Zaregistrujte si bezplatný účet.
Find useful guides, FAQs, and documents to help you navigate and make the most of Esri Community.