nav[aria-label="Primary Navigation"] { padding: 0; & ul { list-style: none; width: 100%; display: flex; flex-direction: row; justify-content: start; align-items: start; gap: 30px; padding: 0; & li { margin: 0; } & ul li { list-style: none; } } }

Utility Network Edit Won't Commit

JK9

We have a brand new utility network implementation, and I'm attempting to perform a routine edit: disconnecting a lateral from a main and reconnecting it to another. The line snaps back to it's original position, without any error in Pro or the server log.

I assumed it was a rule issue and exported the network to a file geodatabase for testing. In the file geodatabase the edit performs just as expected with all of the same rules.

What could stop the edit from committing in our enterprise database?

Najděte více příspěvků označených jako

Accepted answers

All comments

RobertKrisher

If edits are failing, there really should be something in the ArcGIS Server Log. Try it with the log level set to warning (to make it easy to find any errors). Setting it to debug level can help you track it down to something like an attribute rule firing, but be prepared to sift through a lot of edits.

If you haven't already, consider logging a case with support on this.

GIS_kiwi4

@JK9 - Nothing obvious in the screen captures.
The lines seem to be snapping to the devices.

I think it could be attribute rule that might be failing to evaluate properly

The fact that you mentioned you have attribute rules and it works in the fgdb point suggests that issue maybe tied to database rules that only exist in the EGDB environment

PierreloupDucroix

Are you sure you're not editing in Default that is protected ?

JK9

@gis_KIWI4 Screen captures below showing performance in our enterprise geodatabase vs a file geodatabase.

lateral_edit_prod.gif

lateral_edit_fgdb.gif

JK9

There are no constraint rules, but we do have attribute rules for assigning asset id's and location info. I've set the ArcGIS Server Log to debug, but nothing looks out of the ordinary.

Although I have just realized I'm unable to change the asset type on a few laterals, so it appears we have something else going on.

GIS_kiwi4

@JK9 - It is weird that you are seeing different behavior on the eGDB and after you copy it to the fGDB.
Can you share some screencaptures of what you are trying to achieve.

RobertKrisher

Do you have any constraint attribute rules configured on the dataset? Check the ArcGIS Server logs for any warnings or errors.

Připojte se k diskusi

Přihlášení členové mohou přispívat, sledovat aktualizace a další. Jste tu noví? Zaregistrujte si bezplatný účet.

Rychlé odkazy

Community Help
Find useful guides, FAQs, and documents to help you navigate and make the most of Esri Community.