nav[aria-label="Primary Navigation"] { padding: 0; & ul { list-style: none; width: 100%; display: flex; flex-direction: row; justify-content: start; align-items: start; gap: 30px; padding: 0; & li { margin: 0; } & ul li { list-style: none; } } }

Vymezení povodí - Více propustků

AliMcLeod

ArcGIS Pro 2.6

Ahoj všichni - zasekl jsem se při vymezení povodí. Mám stažený archydro toolbox a používám ho co nejvíce místo spatial analyst. Mám přibližně 40 propustků podél 15milové délky silnice, které byly 'vypáleny' do DEM. Přichytil jsem je ke stream linku a zajistil jsem, že všechny toky křižovaly silnici/byly poblíž propustků před vytvořením streamlinku (počet buněk nastaven na 1500). Catchment, adjoint catchment, drainage line a drainage points vypadají všechny správně.

Když použiji Point Delineator, vybere jeden bod propustku a vymezí malou podpovodí (ještě menší než polygon catchmentu). Když použiji Watershed Delineation, jen se točí mezi "droping id" až "processed 0 features" až "final selection" až "sampling" až "100%" a zpět. Nikdy to neskončí a běží to už více než tři hodiny bez výsledků.

Neví někdo o nějakém řešení, abych mohl získat celé povodí, které zahrnuje většinu catchments, ale alespoň hlavní tok? Potřebuji definovat větší velikost buňky pro nový stream link a pak z toho vymezit povodí? Jen chci mít jistotu, že veškerý možný tok vstupuje do propustků a nechci omezit potenciální oblast vytvořením příliš velké stream line.

Najděte více příspěvků označených jako

Water Resources

Arc Hydro

Accepted answers

All comments

AliMcLeod

After digging even deeper into the data, I may have discovered the problem. For some reason, my stream and stream links are not connecting the paths together- and when I turn on the drainage line layer- that feature class is just line data of these two rasters overlapping.

So how do i get one solid stream network to appear, and not have the mainstream itself become disconnected? (Str was a cell size of 500, Str2 was 1000, Str3 was 1200, and Str4 was 1500; StrLnk was created from Str4)

AliMcLeod

in Pro the setup is slightly different....

but-- This is the zoomed out:

this is the zoomed in DEM:

So, this is why I am at an utter loss and confusion! I feel like all the steps I am taking SHOULD yield results. Yet, for some reason- I am coming up empty handed. And like you said earlier, if I am getting correct adjoint catchments, then the data is there and pulling appropriately.

The only issue I see here is the culverts- that the points themselves are causing a problem If the DEM is not a problem, the streams are not a problem, the catchments are not a problem. It has to be the culvert points. Snapped to the streams initially, or not and done during the watershed delineation, same lack of results.

MarkBoucher

I'm still in ArcMap, not Pro. With either version you should be able to symbolize the color ramp on the DEM to view the statistics "From Current Display Extent" (see first image). This allows you to see the subtle differences in the DEM no matter what your zoom level.

The second image below is a portion of our County DEM with this setting. The third image is a zoom in on what looks flat. The color ramp adjusts for the the data in that view revealing more detail.

You should be able to study parts of your DEM to tell if burning the streams is needed, especially where you are getting the small watersheds.

Of course, make sure the right rasters are being used by the delineation tool.

Portion of our County DEM

Zoomed in on the red square.

AliMcLeod

This is my 3m DEM--- but as you can see the northern portion of it is pretty flat. Mostly just creeks/wetlands with no major tributaries.

MarkBoucher

If the DEM has resolution to define the streams, you wouldn't have to burn the streams into the DEM. However, if the streams are not well defined by the DEM (the cell size is large enough to "bridge" the stream and on a color ramp of the DEM [or hillshade of the DEM] the streams are not clearly visible), you may need to burn in the streams.

AliMcLeod

Hi Mark--- yes that was the firs step after burning the DEM with the culverts.

Are you suggesting that I need to additionally burn the streams into the DEM as well?

MarkBoucher

Have you filled sinks? If not, that would be the step you need to do after burning streams and before flow direction.

Připojte se k diskusi

Přihlášení členové mohou přispívat, sledovat aktualizace a další. Jste tu noví? Zaregistrujte si bezplatný účet.

Rychlé odkazy

Community Help
Find useful guides, FAQs, and documents to help you navigate and make the most of Esri Community.