Select to view content in your preferred language

Will ArcGIS desktop advanced run on a Dell Precision 3510?

3799
17
08-26-2017 09:11 AM
KennethVance-Borland
Deactivated User

My Dell Precision M4700 laptop is getting old and I'm looking to replace it. A Dell document listing computer requirements for various software states that ArcGIS needs the Precision 7000 level of hardware, but I'm interested in using a Precision 3510 because it is a couple pounds lighter in weight, and also more economical to purchase. Has anyone had success running ArcGIS desktop advanced on a 3510?

0 Kudos
17 Replies
curtvprice
MVP Esteemed Contributor

IE components are used to compose ArcMap tool dialogs, display metadata (Item Description), and I'm sure a few other things under the hood. Even if you set your default browser to something else.

0 Kudos
KennethVance-Borland
Deactivated User

Thanks for this link, Dan. I'll send it to the Dell person I'm working with and ask them to run it on a 3510.

0 Kudos
VinceAngelo
Esri Esteemed Contributor

Note that there's a difference between "Run" and "Runs well", and a difference between "Runs well with trivial input" and "Runs well with massive input."  The RAM in the computer may have as significant impact on the viability of the platform as the CPU (and disk performance isn't too far behind).  It's difficult to predict platform suitability for any purpose without specific details about the configured host and workload.

- V

JasrajGramopadhye
New Contributor

Hello Vince,

I have a similar question - Would a Dell Laptop - Mobile Precision 5520 with the following specifications run ArcGIS Desktop 10.5 and higher and Pro with heavy processing? I would appreciate any help / suggestions. 

Mobile Precision 5520 Specifications:

  1. Intel Core Xeon E3-1505M v6 (Quad Core Xeon 3.00GHz,
    4.00GHz Turbo, 8MB 45W)
  2. Intel Xeon E3-1505M v6 with Thunderbolt 3, NVIDIA Quadro
    Graphics
  3. Windows 10 Pro for Workstations (up to 4 Cores)
  4. Intel Xeon E3-1505M v6 with Thunderbolt 3, NVIDIA Quadro
    Graphics
  5. NVIDIA Quadro M1200 w/4GB
  6. 32GB (2x16GB) 2400MHz DDR4 Non-ECC SDRAM
  7. 512GB M.2 PCIe Solid State Drive Class 40

Thanks,

Jasraj

0 Kudos
VinceAngelo
Esri Esteemed Contributor

Okay, here's the deal: I refuse to be dragged into a case-by-case hardware evaluation role for GeoNet.

My contribution to this thread was to point out:

It's difficult to predict platform suitability for any purpose ...

That was gently phrased. In fact, it's impossible to predict platform suitability for any purpose (due to OS, drivers, data, networks, and an infinite number of imponderables).  The last time I had to do a hardware procurement for a customer, it took several weeks to assemble the shopping list. We got a posterior-kicking lab out of the deal (after oodles of driver nightmares), but I didn't sleep for two weeks while waiting to see how it would work out.

In the end, only you can decide what is appropriate for your needs, and I'm not going to tangle myself in that process.

Best of luck to you.

- V 

KennethVance-Borland
Deactivated User

HI Jasraj -- Based on my entirely satisfactory experience with my Precision 3520 I would imagine you would find the 5520 to perform very well. If you haven't already, check out the links that MidnightYell_2003 posted at the very top of this thread pointing to the ArcGIS Desktop and Pro system requirements. And if you have a chance before you purchase to try the link to "check your computer's ability to run ArcGIS Pro" that Dan_Patterson posted it would be informative for you. Or try it after you purchase to assess your system. Mine passed with flying colors. Best of luck, and please report back on what system you got and how it performs.             -ken

From: "Gramopadhye, Jasraj" <geonet@esri.com>

To: Kenneth Vance-Borland <kenvb@consplan.net>

Sent: Wednesday, April 4, 2018 10:02 AM

Subject: Re: - Re: Will ArcGIS desktop advanced run on a Dell Precision 3510?

#yiv1205498169 * #yiv1205498169 a #yiv1205498169 body {font-family:Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif;}#yiv1205498169 #yiv1205498169 h1, #yiv1205498169 h2, #yiv1205498169 h3, #yiv1205498169 h4, #yiv1205498169 h5, #yiv1205498169 h6, #yiv1205498169 p, #yiv1205498169 hr {}#yiv1205498169 .yiv1205498169button td {}

|

GeoNet

|

Re: Will ArcGIS desktop advanced run on a Dell Precision 3510?

reply from Gramopadhye, Jasraj in Natural Resources - View the full discussionHello Vince, I have a similar question - Would a Dell Laptop - Mobile Precision 5520 with the following specifications run ArcGIS Desktop 10.5 and higher and Pro with heavy processing? I would appreciate any help / suggestions.  Mobile Precision 5520 Specifications: 

- Intel Core Xeon E3-1505M v6 (Quad Core Xeon 3.00GHz,

4.00GHz Turbo, 8MB 45W)

- Intel Xeon E3-1505M v6 with Thunderbolt 3, NVIDIA Quadro

Graphics

- Windows 10 Pro for Workstations (up to 4 Cores)

- Intel Xeon E3-1505M v6 with Thunderbolt 3, NVIDIA Quadro

Graphics

- NVIDIA Quadro M1200 w/4GB

- 32GB (2x16GB) 2400MHz DDR4 Non-ECC SDRAM

- 512GB M.2 PCIe Solid State Drive Class 40

 Thanks,Jasraj

Reply to this message by replying to this email, or go to the message on GeoNet

Start a new discussion in Natural Resources by email or at GeoNet

Following Re: Will ArcGIS desktop advanced run on a Dell Precision 3510? in these streams: Inbox

This email was sent by GeoNet because you are a registered user.

You may unsubscribe instantly from GeoNet, or adjust email frequency in your email preferences |

|

0 Kudos
DanPatterson_Retired
MVP Emeritus

Kenneth

The thread is rambling through no fault of your own.

Make sure you report if the Dell people actually ran the test for you ... it will be useful information to pass on if they did

0 Kudos
KennethVance-Borland
Deactivated User

Hi all -- As it turns out I purchased a Precision 3520 with:

Intel Core i7-7700HQ (Quad Core 2.80GHz, 3.80GHz Turbo, 6MB 35W)
Nvidia Quadro M620 w/2GB GDDR5 graphics card
8GB (2x4GB) 2400MHz DDR4 Non-ECC SDRAM
512GB M.2 SATA SED Solid State drive Class 2
Using the link Dan provided to check if this computer's ability to run ArcGIS Pro 2.0 resulted in: "Congratulations, your system passes the Recommended requirements! You should have a great experience running this product."
And in fact ArcGIS 10.5.1 is working just fine for me, though I haven't run any big processes yet.
Thanks for all the pointers and discussion, everyone.