Hi there,
was not able to find info about this on the Esri Documentation for Workflow Manager Server so I thought I would try my luck here. What is the max limit of the [index] number that is generated from each new Workflow Job Template that can be stored in the system? For example, if after a certain high index number like "JOB_9999" is generated, will the system still be able to store index numbers above "9999" or will there be a failover and the index number will restart?
Thanks!
Solved! Go to Solution.
Hi @EvaTTA
We use an ObjectID field for the [index] number on job naming. Currently, ObjectIDs are limited to 32-bit values, which store a maximum value of 2,147,483,647.
Esri is currently looking into implementing a 64-bit ObjectID field so this may be even less of a concern in the future.
Jonathan
If that did happen, users would be prevented from creating new jobs. But this isn't a Workflow Manager issue, rather an ArcGIS Data Store issue. There is currently not a way to recycle OIDs in Data Store. Having said that, we're not aware of a user that has run into this with Data Store and active development work is happening with 64-bit OIDs that should make this even less of a concern in the future.
Jonathan
Hi @EvaTTA
We use an ObjectID field for the [index] number on job naming. Currently, ObjectIDs are limited to 32-bit values, which store a maximum value of 2,147,483,647.
Esri is currently looking into implementing a 64-bit ObjectID field so this may be even less of a concern in the future.
Jonathan
Hi Jonathan,
Thanks for the reply. What would happen if a job name index number goes past 2,147,483,647?
If that did happen, users would be prevented from creating new jobs. But this isn't a Workflow Manager issue, rather an ArcGIS Data Store issue. There is currently not a way to recycle OIDs in Data Store. Having said that, we're not aware of a user that has run into this with Data Store and active development work is happening with 64-bit OIDs that should make this even less of a concern in the future.
Jonathan
Hi Jonathan,
Thanks, that helps me to understand more about the job index numbering system and how its more of an ArcGIS Datastore issue.