Hello,
I'm experiencing a curious issue with a large (10,000+ features) hosted feature layer dataset when brought into EXPB, as well as in AGOL.
This layer has a field called "permit" representing permit types for parking spaces. A permit name was recently changed from "Family Graduate Housing" (or "FGH") to "Fox," and I brought the service into pro to apply this change to the data.
I had templates for this layer in pro when I was creating it. I went in and selected all features where permit=FGH, and changed this value to Fox. I then updated the template to represent Fox, and everything seemed good in pro.
Upon bringing this layer into AGOL however, the values that were once FGH and changed to Fox now display as <No Value> in the detailed view of the permit field in the data tab of the layer (see "NoValueExample" screenshot). In experience builder, the data does not reflect this change within widgets only. That is, selecting a feature on the map widget brings up the appropriate popup, indicating the feature is of permit type "Fox," but widgets still display FGH as a permit type and not Fox.
I'm attempting to create a filter widget for users to filter by permit type "Fox," but Fox is not an option in selecting values for this field in the SQL expression. "Family Graduate Housing" is still an option, though no features of this permit type still exist (see screenshot: "EXPBuilderIssue").
I'm curious if EXPB is still attempting to honor the original templates present when the layer was published, though I'm under the impression templates don't carry to AGOL. I've waited 24hrs now in case it was a syncing issue, but the problem remains. I also downloaded the data from AGOL as a FGDB, and the table for the layer indicates permit type Fox when brought to pro, rather than <No Value> as seen in AGOL. No domain exists or has existed for this field in pro, and no list exists in AGOL.
I setup a filter and predefined the unique value "Fox," serving as a workaround for the underlying issue. I would like to resolve this to ensure the integrity of the data however.
Anywho, thank you for reading, and any feedback is much appreciated. Let me know if more information is needed.