nav[aria-label="Primary Navigation"] { padding: 0; & ul { list-style: none; width: 100%; display: flex; flex-direction: row; justify-content: start; align-items: start; gap: 30px; padding: 0; & li { margin: 0; } & ul li { list-style: none; } } }

Why did Esri choose to create zLas, a proprietary format, rather than collaborating with or building on existing open standards like LASzip?

TomMacWright1

For background, see Paul Ramsey's article: Format Wars Episode V: LIDAR - Boundless‌

And James Fee: LAS, LAZ, LasZip, zLAS and You‌

How does this decision square with Esri's "Open" initiative?

Find more posts tagged with

Standards & Specifications

Accepted answers

All comments

There are no accepted answers yet

Join the Conversation

Signed in members can post, follow updates, and more. New here? Register a free account.

Quick Links

All Communities
Recent Posts
Followed Content
Community Help

Community Help
Find useful guides, FAQs, and documents to help you navigate and make the most of Esri Community.