nav[aria-label="Primary Navigation"] { padding: 0; & ul { list-style: none; width: 100%; display: flex; flex-direction: row; justify-content: start; align-items: start; gap: 30px; padding: 0; & li { margin: 0; } & ul li { list-style: none; } } }

Script for dissolve/ Roll up data with ArcGIS PRO

Akchademir

I need to make a scripts tools that will consolidate attributes from many rows into to one across a number of columns.

And the opposite of dissolve date (like drilling into data attributes) .

I have the Following data attribute:

Thanks for any helps!

Find more posts tagged with

Accepted answers

All comments

Akchademir

Yes i must use Arcmap, thanks for your response.

Anonymous User

Will they be accessing this layer in arcmap, or through a webmap? I think you are limited to what Dan described with relating aggregated data back to the counties if it is arcmap. I don't think there is the top-down functionality (without creating your own application) in arcmap to be country, state, county based on mouse clicks. However, If it is going to be used in a webmap, then you can use Arcade to perform the aggregation of field values for what the user clicks on.

Akchademir

For example, the three hierarchy levels are country, state and district. These fields are geographic fields and I am able to plot them on three separate maps.

The requirement is to create a top-down analysis such that when the user clicks on the country, the top-down analysis should take the user to the states and show all the states. Then when the user clicks on a state, the drilldown should bring the user to see the districts and show all the sub-districts.

danretired

You haven't said what you want to keep and what you want to do with it.

Also, sometimes having multiple maps with different expressions of the underlying data is the best option.

There is no "tool does everything"

Akchademir

Is there no other option ?

danretired

Open the table. What parameters did you specify for dealing with the tables during the dissolve?

They are limited.

If you expect to keep the whole row's contents for each polygon that was dissolved, then you will be disappointed, because you would have to "relate" the undissolved table back to the dissolved geometry's table