Is ArcGIS Pro ready for serious analyst use?

Discussion created by on Mar 16, 2016
Latest reply on Jul 19, 2017 by mvolz47

It's faster.  It's prettier.  It allows you to easily step over into 3D views of stuff.  I'm very tempted.  But:


1.  I have to relearn a thousand instinctive habits (although age 62.5, I think I can manage this - it will help keep me young).

2.  Can't share mxd's with colleagues still on ArcMAP (don't do that very often anyway).

3.  Fear and trembling that a bug with no easy work-around will stop me in my tracks (Pro 1.0 and 1.1 were like this).


Can't afford to spend a week learning, only to find out the beast is not ready for prime time.  What say other analysts who may have run Pro 1.2 around the track a few times?