Select to view content in your preferred language

TWI results comparison from USGS 3DEP DEM getter ArcGIS tool vs ESRI Living Atlas Terrain DEM

222
0
01-23-2025 12:44 PM
Labels (1)
Ed_
by MVP Regular Contributor
MVP Regular Contributor

Hello, ESRI water resources team, so which of the following two seems to have better quality? I am more inclined towards the TWI derived from the Terrain DEM as it looks more smooth and less pixelated. 

Ed__0-1737664617004.png

Ed__16-1737664618554.png

Ed__21-1737664911208.png

From Terrain DEM

Ed__22-1737664958307.png

From USGS 3DEP DEM Getter ArcGIS Pro tool

Top:

TWI raster generated using Model Builder. The model iterates through a geodatabase of individual HUC12 boundary feature classes, using the boundaries as a mask to extract the Terrain imagery layer from the Living Atlas using the Extract By Mask tool, then resamples the resulting extracted raster to 3-meter resolution, smoothes the raster using the ArcHydro Smooth High Resolution DEM tool, then finally generating the TWI raster

Bottom:

TWI raster generated by a Python Script that goes through the same workflow as the model, but with some added steps (generating surface water rasters for DTW inputs). The difference is that the Python script was using a DEM obtained using the DEM Getter toolbox, which downloads DEMs from the USGS by bounding box at 1-meter resolution. No other inputs for any of the other tools mentioned were changed, only the DEM is different between the script and the model.

Ed__15-1737664618550.png

 

Ed__14-1737664618544.png

 

Ed__4-1737664618139.png

Ed__13-1737664618537.png

 

Ed__12-1737664618534.png

 

Ed__3-1737664618021.png

Ed__11-1737664618526.png

 

Ed__10-1737664618521.png

 

Ed__9-1737664618517.png

 

Ed__2-1737664617808.png

Ed__8-1737664618513.png

 

Ed__7-1737664618413.png

Ed__20-1737664618580.png

 

Ed__6-1737664618292.png

Ed__19-1737664618576.png

 

Ed__18-1737664618573.png

 

Ed__17-1737664618570.png

 

Question | Analyze | Visualize
Tags (1)
0 Kudos
0 Replies