Latest Contributions by ColinCampbell

‎07-07-2020

Yeah, the same thing happens if you just run it standalone outside of a model.

‎07-07-2020

Hi Dan, Thanks for this. I had seen this page, but had hoped when it said ' The following tools will transfer attachments ' it was referring to tools that were moving or copying data, or creating a completely new layer. In my example the tool is effectively just adding a column to an existing layer and updating that column (i.e. nothing that you would expect would have any effect on the relationship between the layer and attachments). Are you saying that if I use any other geoprocessing tools, other than the eight listed, I will lose the attachments? If so are there any work arounds or other methods I can use to keep the attachments? Cheers Colin

‎07-06-2020

Hi all, I have a model (a much simplified version of which is shown below) that appends a feature layer from ArcGIS to a geodatabase and then runs a series of geoprocessing tools on the data. The feature layer has attached images which need to be retained within the geodatabase. The append step works fine, but when the next tool runs (in this case Extract Multi Values to Points) the output layer layer looses the attachments table and the relationship class between them (they completely disappear - see 'before and after' images below). Is this a bug and/or is there any way to prevent this from happening and maintaining the attachments?

‎05-13-2020

Thanks for this Ismael Chivite‌. I have two questions: Firstly, you say ' Connect does not create views, and does not handle them well when you delete or modify the survey. This is something that is going to change,'. Is there an rough estimate when this might be the case? Secondly, in the past when doing public surveys we've been guided to use the feature layer directly (i.e. not creating a view) and to alter the settings on that to prevent public access to the data (using a settings setup like shown in the attached image). Whilst we'll use views in the future, has our data been insecure if we have shared the feature service publicly but using the settings as shown below?

‎03-06-2020

Hi, I was wondering how a Hub page is discovered by search engines and if there's any way to influence which pages a SE brings back as matches? For our hub - one for surveying Willow Tits - if I put in ‘Willow Tit Hub’ into Google the second match (and the only one relevant to our hub) is the following: https://national-willow-tit-survey-rspb.hub.arcgis.com/datasets/about-this-site Whilst it’s great to be getting a hit on the hub (for a while I didn’t get anything relevant coming back) the page given isn’t really part of the hub (in fact I'd never seen it before). It looks to be related to one of the hub’s real pages: https://national-willow-tit-survey-rspb.hub.arcgis.com/pages/about-this-site But has ‘datasets’ rather than ‘pages’ in the url and so gives a more metadata-type view than the page. I think this would be fairly confusing to someone looking for the hub, even though you can get to the actual content by clicking at the top menu bar. What would be much better would be if it gave an actual page on the hub – and ideally the main/home page. Is there anything I can do to address this? It's fairly important that people can find hubs this way.

‎03-04-2020

Hi David, That's really useful to know - and thank you for adding it as a feature request. Thanks for your help.

‎03-04-2020

Hi Erwin This is really useful. Thanks for your help.

‎02-28-2020

Hi, Using AppStudio is it possible to create functionality within an app whereby a user can select an area of interest and just download the data within that area for offline use? In particular, is it possible for them to select an area of basemap and have that available offline (in an identical way to how Collector operates)? I've seen various posts/information about how to download existing mmpks into offline apps, but our field workers (that potentially number into the 100s) cover the entire country and it's not feasible to create a mmpk for each potential area they might survey. I don't necessarily need to know how to do it, just if it's possible. Thanks in advance.

‎02-28-2020

Hi James, That's really helpful to know. Thanks again for looking into it.

‎02-25-2020

Hi James, The repeat becomes relevant if the user selects one of two values in a single select (I've attached the .xlsx for the survey and you can see the live form here). The question ' Did you observe willow tit or marsh tit during your visit? ' is the one that triggers the repeat (when you select 'Yes'). Just in case it helps, I've also attached a picture to show how the blank rows are appearing in the repeat. Many thanks for your help looking into this. Colin

Online Status	Offline
Date Last Visited	‎11-11-2020 02:23 AM

My Ideas

Latest Contributions by ColinCampbell

Re: Attachments lost when running a model/geoprocessing tool

Re: Attachments lost when running a model/geoprocessing tool

Attachments lost when running a model/geoprocessing tool

Re: Securing data in public surveys (Survey123 Connect)

Is there any way to control/influence how search engines discover a hub site?

Re: Does 'Send data to this survey' work with polygons?

Re: Can a user define an offline map area within app

Can a user define an offline map area within app

Re: Blank rows in 'hidden' repeat

Re: Blank rows in 'hidden' repeat