Latest Contributions by NKneisel

Yes,  Appears to be public. I changed the name of my feature service layers, and I don't know how to change it back to the original.  I do want to change the name, as the previous ones weren't correct.   I was able to go back, re-name layers to originals from my sheet, then republished, which worked. But, there has to be some way of re-naming these fields with _values_ so that they appear nicer in field maps, and other uses in AGOL with-out breaking the link to the surveys? Also, I'm using a bunch of repeats turned into separate feature classes with this survey, so re-creating from the feature class would be a nightmare. Is there a way to relink to the survey?         ... View more

Hi Guys, I renamed my feature services in Field Maps, which broke my link to the data. How do I go about fixing the link to that data again?   ... View more

OMG, no way. I downloaded and re-installed it, but maybe I'm not using the latest form or maybe I have to completely uninstall and re-install. Regardless, It's so great to have a community to troubleshoot these small errors while we're all working remotely!  Getting this working will increase the functionality immensely! Thanks, Jim for your patience! ... View more

Hi Jim, Yes, I've been using the latest. Downloaded the latest to triple-check. Were you able to get the layer depth integer using this method of a note for position(..)? I tried switching the integer for a calculate, but that did not work either. Did this work on your end? Still getting the same result:   ... View more

Appreciate the feedback!   Yes, sadly I previously tried the options you suggested with no luck. I am trying to utilize the integer for the 'lyr_dpth' field both inside and outside the repeat structure.  This is to auto-fill a layer depth inside the repeat and to use the layer depths for 3D layer symbology with photos of each layer outside the repeat (3D scenes don’t symbolize repeat tables unless I ‘jenk-them’ into feature classes using illegal auto-filled hidden geo-points). Funny part is, I get a -1 value (inside and outside the repeat) for any integer or note field using an indexed-repeat(${lyr_dpth}, ${lyr_calcs_rpt}, 1).  Sorry about the -1 index.  It was just to show that I tried it, and it returned a –1. Funnier part is, I do get the get the text value for 'lyr_dpth' (representing desired integer value) when using the selected-at(${lyr_dpth}, position(..)-1), and layer_count: count-selected(${lyr_dpth}) Tried your version, and the indexed repeat value still displays -1, for 'lyr_dpth' both on the published and unpublished side of Survey 123 Connect for the ‘lyr_dpth’ integer I was trying to get.      All I know about indexed-repeats, is if it can’t find the index, it returns a -1.  Setting the layer_count seems to return a value.  Usually, the repeat structure is as you said, so index 1, gives you the first value, 2 the second…  Unfortunately, my index of 1 gives -1, 2 gives -2.  Maybe I am missing a repeat count somewhere for my indexed repeat to call from? Pulling an integer elevation would be very useful in Geology, to Soils, Water, Ice, and Snow core visualization in 3D with photo's per layer.   I'm just hoping to get a non -1 value to be returned for an indexed repeat.  My rookie skills can return a value in excel, but no success in Survey 123.  I must be missing one very valuable step? Nathan Attached both of our files.     ... View more

Hey Jim, I'm able to get the text value for 'lyr_dpth' for the layer I want, when I use selected-at(${lyr_dpth}, position(..)-1), after I use a repeat_count of: count-selected(${lyr_dpth}) But my elementary understanding fails on getting an indexed repeat integer value for the same layer.   However, when I try for an Integer value, I get a -1, for an index of '1'; or --1, for index -1. For an integer value, there must be a index aspect I am missing for the indexed-repeat to call the value of lyr_depth index 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 etc, to visualize in 3D.   Currently, I'm just jenking the repeat structure, turning it into a feature layer by putting the same geo-point inside the repeat, and defaulting the xy to the original. This has benefits, but it also has some disadvantages for displaying layered data in 3D.       ... View more