If we agree that fostering spatial thinking in education and in society is important, how can we know if we are succeeding in that effort? Many people rightly want to find out what the most effective ways of measuring spatial thinking are and how to implement them. Assessing spatial thinking has been discussed over the past few decades in venues from research articles to conference panel sessions, resulting in a small but growing set of spatial thinking measures. In this essay I describe a new spatial thinking test that is straightforward but one that could provide numerous benefits to instructors and even to the students taking the test. A key way of fostering spatial thinking is the use of GIS technology and approaches in education. This has been the subject of many essays in this Esri education community space, theses and dissertations by students from all over the world, research articles such as here and here, and even entire books such as ones I have co-written and many others that my colleagues have written such as here. I recently wrote this essay describing 10 key educational benefits in teaching with GIS. One benefit cited by many is spatial thinking (read my own definition of it). During my early USGS days, I used a stereoscope and aerial photo pairs to assess students' spatial thinking abilities. This was a perennially popular activity that I have now brought into the modern GIS world, as I explain below. Assessing the results of spatial thinking is complicated, messy, and influenced by many variables, including the method used to foster it, the instructional setting, the learning styles and background of the student, and many others. Despite the challenges, educators and others have attempted to devise and test assessments that measure spatial thinking. Most of these are focused on the broad definition of spatial thinking, which includes cognitive psychology. Spatial thinking is much broader in scope than geospatial thinking. Spatial thinking tests often include rotating 2D and 3D shapes, such as this one from Newton and Bristoll (you can take or give this type of spatial thinking test yourself here). The attention that spatial thinking is beginning to receive in disciplines outside of geography, GIS, and environmental studies has netted some spatial visualization measures in those disciplines, too, such as in engineering. Most of us in geotechnology education are really most focused on geospatial thinking. Geospatial thinking assessments are fewer in number than those in the wider "spatial thinking" research community. That said, several geospatial thinking tests/assessments have been developed and successfully used. The most oft-cited is probably Lee and Bednarz' Spatial Thinking Abilities Test (STAT), created in conjunction with the Teacher’s Guide to Modern Geography (TGMG) project of the American Association of Geographers (AAG). Other researchers have adapted and modified this test, in Japan, and others have created new tests, in Spain, (note, the previous 2 links point directly to the download of the PDF files of the research), in Greece, in Europe, and in Canada. In what I hope is a valuable contribution to these assessment efforts, I have devised a spatial thinking assessment activity that takes advantage of the easy-to-use 3D scene viewer, part of the ArcGIS Online platform. The lesson: Ask students to create a new 3D scene in ArcGIS Online. In the 3D scene, ask them to create one 3D scene "slide" for each digital oblique aerial photo that you, the instructor, supplies or points them to. The challenge: The student's 3D scene slide must match as closely as possible, the angle to ground, the scale, and the cardinal direction to which the aerial is aligned. Why use oblique aerials? Obliques provide an extra challenge and an intuitive connection to the 3D scene capabilities, though you could certainly use traditional straight-from-above imagery from ArcGIS Online or other sources as well. If you used straight-from-above imagery, you could use ArcGIS Online, or the ArcGIS Online 3D scene viewer, or even ArcGIS Pro. In my case I am using oblique imagery and the ArcGIS Online 3D scene viewer. With gracious permission from my colleague Vern Whitten who owns his own aerial and outdoor photo company, Vern Whitten Photography, I am using a set of aerials that Vern flew in Minnesota and North Dakota in summer 2021, in this collection. In the activity and assessment, the student first examines an image from the collection, below: The student then enters the latitude and longitude shown at the bottom of the image in the search box in the ArcGIS 3D Scene viewer. The student then simultaneously examines by toggling back and forth, in separate browser tabs, the aerial and the 3D scene, adjusting the latter so it matches the former. In a few minutes, I created the following 3D scene and captured it as a slide, shown below, for the above aerial. For a 2 minute demonstration, see this video. For assistance on creating scenes and slides, see this documentation. When done, students should test each slide to make certain its settings closely match each aerial as possible. When saving, students need to pay attention to which slide they are using as the initial default view. What is being assessed? (1) Skills in creating a 3D scene, part of modern GIS workflows and tools, including the use of image layers, scene navigation, slide creation, saving, and sharing. (2) Spatial thinking skills: Orientation, scale, identifying ground features, elevation, horizon. (3) Geographic skills: Change over space and time, natural forces acting on the landscape, human forces acting on the landscape. (4) Communication skills: Consider asking your students to present their results to you and to their peers in your online or F2F class in a 5 minute presentation. They could make use of their 3D scene above and even embed the 3D scene in a story map where they answer some of the extended questions I pose below. (5) Self-reflection on learning. Consider including a few questions that ask students to reflect on the content and skills they gained through this activity. My assessment includes how close the students 3D scenes come to the (1) angle of view, (2) orientation (cardinal direction), and (3) the scale of the scene. I avoid getting too granular in my assessment; rather, I use "they match", "they are close to matching", and "they do not match" as the rubric for each of the three measures. Example. As an example, see this 3D scene I created of the first 15 of the 26 images in the aerial collection. Advance through several slides so that you and your students get the idea. You can ask students to create slides and a scene for images 16-26, or start completely over and do all 26. Or use other aerials as I describe below. What I like about this activity and assessment. It is replicable and extendable, as I describe below, for other areas, dates, and types of imagery. It is able to be worked through in a short amount of time. It can be adapted for multiple ages from secondary to university level. Younger aged students do not even need to sign in to ArcGIS Online to do this activity; they could create each slide and screen shot each of them, saving them in a Word or PowerPoint file, for example. The assessment builds students spatial thinking and use of GIS while taking it. It is engaging and challenging. It is fun for students to do! In fact, Vern described his collection to me as "come fly with me", and when the students are creating slides in their 3D scene, they really do feel like they're up in the airplane with Vern! Extending this activity. Add additional imagery types in your 3D scene and toggle back and forth between the default basemap imagery to, say, NAIP imagery or the Clarity imagery layer. You will notice the clarity layer as a choice to toggle on and off in the 3D scene I created, above. Find additional imagery from aircraft, UAVs, or satellites and ask students to create 3D scenes matching those images. Start with the ArcGIS Living Atlas of the World for your imagery sources, and also look for local sources in your area, often served on ArcGIS Hub sites. I provide further guidance in our data blog, here. You could add even more challenge by asking students to build then-vs-now scenes using historic aerials, such as these in Iowa or these in Minneapolis (going back to the 1920s!) or even these from the spy program from the Cold War! You could even tie another theme in with this activity, such as settlement patterns, river systems, landforms (as I wrote about recently), or others. Additional Questions. Consider asking, discussing, and assessing these additional questions for each study area (the area covered by the current 3D scene slide), including: Name 1 benefit of orienting your scene such that north is not at the "top". Name 1 challenge of orienting when north is not "top". The collection referenced in this essay contains the time and date stamp to the left of the latitude-longitude coordinates. What time of day and what season of the year was the aerial photograph taken? (Note: If you are using oblique imagery without a time and date stamp, then you should still ask this question, because your students can still use clues about the direction the shadows are casting, leaves on trees, snow cover or lack of it, and so on). Now make your best estimation on the time of day and season of the year in which the image in your 3D scene was taken. What clues helped you determine the day and season for your 3D scene? Name 2 differences between the imagery in the aerial vs your 3D scene. This could be the resolution of the imagery, the extent of the aerial and the 3D scene imagery, the colors, or something else. Be sure to specify which image type you are using in your 3D scene (default imagery, clarity imagery, or another image source). At the time of this writing (late 2021), the aerials are likely to be newer than the satellite images. List 2 changes that you have detected in natural features (rivers, vegetation, etc) between the aerial and the satellite image. List 2 changes that you have detected in human-built features (buildings, roads, etc) between the aerial and the satellite image. What is the predominant land use in the your study area? Name 2 occupations that people living here could have. What do you think your study area will look like in 10 years? In 50 years? What do you think this area looked like 50 years ago? Why? Compare the amount of change in your study area to the amount of change in the community in which you live. Name 2 natural forces acting on your study area, and 2 human-caused forces acting on your study area. One of the aerials shows an event happening (at the fairgrounds and racetrack in Fargo). Name 2 clues in the aerial that tell you that an event is happening. Is an event happening in the other aerials that you are examining? If yes, what are the clues that you can observe? Pan and zoom on your 3D scene until you find a river. Change the base map to imagery with labels or topographic base map so you will know the name of the river. Follow the river downstream until you find the river or lake it drains into. How can you determine which direction is upstream and which direction is downstream? Keep following until you reach an ocean. Which rivers and lakes did the water in your original study area drain into on its path to the ocean, and which ocean did it drain into. What, if any, major cities does the river pass through on its journey? Name 1 reason why that city is located on the river. Zoom back into your study area with your original imagery basemap. Then, zoom out from your study area shown in your current 3D scene slide until you see the entire region and most of the continent. In which state, country, and continent was the aerial photo taken? How far is the study area from your own location? Use the measure tool in the 3D scene viewer to find out. Ask your own question about this area. Can you answer your own question? It is OK if you cannot answer your own question: Some questions need additional research to answer! Interested in developing your own geospatial thinking assessment instrument? The community needs your contribution! I am asked about valid and rigorous assessment tools on a weekly basis, and the literature is full of comments about the relative lack of these tools. Besides the assessments mentioned above, another helpful framework you could use is the Structured Geospatial Analytical Method from Penn State. It begins with asking " how can one teach the cognitive skills needed to approach geospatial analysis?" To see this in action, examine the Learner's Guide to Geospatial Analysis. Other useful frameworks are this geoscience habits of mind and the document that in many ways started the renewed emphasis on fostering spatial thinking through geotechnologies, the 2006 NRC report Learning to Think Spatially. But I also encourage you to make rigorous use of web maps, 3D scenes, web mapping applications such as story maps and dashboards, spatial analysis tools, and other capabilities in the ArcGIS platform to foster spatial and critical thinking. In so doing, I am sure you will think of many creative ways to assess your students' work.
... View more
Agree wholeheartedly with this Blog (and of course a traditional resume) This blog post is required reading for my GIS 312 (Intermediate GIS) students at the University of Washington Tacoma. We have since transitioned to a 'Esri ArcGIS StoryMap Collection' as the required method of creating an online portfolio. Students usually list their portfolio in the header of their cover letters and resume.
... View more
I created this story map that takes advantage of the new map actions capabilities to illustrate the educational possibilities of map actions. Map actions allow for something to happen as the user interacts with your story map. In this case, the user is guided through a series of landforms in a geomorphology investigation, but I encourage you to consider other themes and topics, and the maps and images that could support those topics, that you are seeking to teach with using these same techniques. In the story map, I provide the 2D map and 3D scene that supports the landforms investigation and quiz for further exploration, as well as a link to guidelines for creating the map actions. I chose geomorphology for this example for several key reasons: First, geomorphology touches on human-environment interaction and can be used to effectively teach about change over time, how the landscape influences humans (settlement patterns, land use) and how humans influence landscapes (direct and indirect modification). Those of you who have known me for years probably remember when I worked at USGS, I used to carry around an enormous roll of 100 paper topographic maps held together by some massive rubber bands to teach these same concepts. Second, using these digital USGS topographic maps (one of the basemaps that you can access in ArcGIS Online) in a story map is much more versatile (and lighter to "carry"!) than being tied to those paper maps. In addition, students and faculty can change their scale, add data to them (such as land cover, precipitation patterns, population density, and more), and perform analysis on them (such as create watersheds, trace downstream, and calculate viewshed). Story map with map action on an educational theme (geomorphology). A section of the story map referenced above using map actions. The scale and location change, in this story map, when the map user clicks on the boxes above or elsewhere in the map, strings of text. I look forward to your comments below!
... View more
I created this story map that takes advantage of the new map actions capabilities to illustrate the educational possibilities of map actions. Map actions allow for something to happen as the user interacts with your story map. In this case, the user is guided through a series of landforms in a geomorphology investigation, but I encourage you to consider other themes and topics, and the maps and images that could support those topics, that you are seeking to teach with using these same techniques. In the story map, I provide the 2D map and 3D scene that supports the landforms investigation and quiz for further exploration, as well as a link to guidelines for creating the map actions.
I chose geomorphology for this example for several key reasons: First, geomorphology touches on human-environment interaction and can be used to effectively teach about change over time, how the landscape influences humans (settlement patterns, land use) and how humans influence landscapes (direct and indirect modification). Those of you who have known me for years probably remember when I worked at USGS, I used to carry around an enormous roll of 100 paper topographic maps held together by some massive rubber bands to teach these same concepts. Second, using these digital USGS topographic maps (one of the basemaps that you can access in ArcGIS Online) in a story map is much more versatile (and lighter to "carry"!) than being tied to those paper maps. In addition, students and faculty can change their scale, add data to them (such as land cover, precipitation patterns, population density, and more), and perform analysis on them (such as create watersheds, trace downstream, and calculate viewshed).
Story map with map action on an educational theme (geomorphology). A section of the story map referenced above using map actions. The scale and location change, in this story map, when the map user clicks on the boxes above or elsewhere in the map, strings of text.
I look forward to your comments below!
... View more
Granted you will need to do a test for each field, but you could reduce the code required using a ternary condition test as in: var aNL = TextFormatting.NewLine;
var popupString = "";
var lineBreak = "_______________________";
popupString += lineBreak;
popupString += IIF(!IsEmpty($feature.PARCELID), aNL + "APN: " + $feature.PARCELID, "");
popupString += IIF(!IsEmpty($feature.incorpname), aNL + $feature.SA_FullAddress, "");
... View more