POST
|
Hi David, Yes to show the current local date of the client browser. I think this would be fine. The associated map will hopefully be showing survey data for the local day. I appreciate any ideas you might have. I'm trying to figure out the best way for the associated map to also have a dynamic date filter on the layers too to only be showing data from local date and in our case AK time zone. Thanks much, Kathy
... View more
Saturday
|
0
|
1
|
7
|
POST
|
Hi, I am new to Experience Builder and would like the current local date to appear in a text box. The idea is the map displays current survey day results for surveys and then another page displays all surveys, so the '3/2/2021' would update dynamically each day. Is there a way to accomplish this? I'm not seeing an option since its not directly linked to selected data. Thanks in advance, Kathy
... View more
|
0
|
3
|
78
|
DOC
|
Hello, I am also looking to have a dynamic date filter in the web map and similar to @CANC-BrianBowersAGOL I want only features to show on the map for the current date (AK Time) so just 1 hour different than the example posted using Pacific Standard Time. It is my understanding if I use the recommendation above from @JakeSkinner "CreationDate" in the last 1 day, this really mean last 24 hours and then spans 2 days at times depending on the hour which isn't what I want. I do see the option for "CreationDate" is after and then you can choose a date. If I set a filter for "CreationDate" is after 2/26/21 and I want to show features collected only on 2/27/21 in AK Time, does the 2/26/21 refer to local time or UTC or I do translate this? Although this filter is no longer dynamic then either. I also did try the AGOL Assistant and DefinitionQuery, but I'm not sure if this is still the best way since the setting on SQL queries is no longer showing. I also tried the arcade expression but besides features still showing in pop-ups I lose the symbology I want displayed in the map. What are the recommended solutions? I feel like this should be a straightforward request to only show features from current 'local time zone' day. Thanks in advance!!!
... View more
a week ago
|
0
|
0
|
55
|
POST
|
Thanks @AlixPower! I'm so glad to hear that on the large .tpkx files and the files not affecting performance of the app, very good news. Thank-you!
... View more
2 weeks ago
|
0
|
0
|
44
|
POST
|
Hello, I am putting together base map imagery .tpkx files to sideload on iPads for use in ArcGIS Field Maps in offline data collection environments. The surveys are for aerial surveys and cover large areas. The iPads have internal storage of 256 GB so we have lots of space. I've created .tpkx files that are range from 5 GB to 12 GB to date. The basemaps .tpkx seem to function ok within Field Maps, but we haven't thoroughly tested. Is there a limit or maximum size recommended for the .tpkx when using in Field Maps? Does the size of the .tpkx slow down the app or cause issues? I have only read more of the device limitations if there isn't enough space to store the larger .tpkx, but I haven't found anything on the app functionality. Thanks in advance for any info, Kathy
... View more
2 weeks ago
|
0
|
2
|
474
|
POST
|
Hello, I have an ArcGIS Pro (2.7) project set up that is using feature layers from AGOL. I then have a script tool and Notebook I have been using for a number of tasks including updating definition queries for a number of layers in several of the maps. This has been working fine until today. Today the same feature layers are not updated or even allow definition queries. In the code to help troubleshoot we checked to see if the feature layer supports definition queries: print(lyr.name, "", lyr.supports("DEFINITIONQUERY")) and it returns false for a number of layers. It does work for updating the definition query in the tracks layer I have in the project. I'm so perplexed on why the feature layers no longer support definition queries using python? I can manually do this in the project, but obviously this is not what I want. I have tried several different feature layer services and I'm running into the same issue. These are ones I shared thru ArcGIS Pro to AGOL, but the script/definition query was working last week. What could cause this change in the feature layer service for the layer to return a 'false' on supporting DEFINITIONQUERY????? Thanks in advance!!! Kathy
... View more
3 weeks ago
|
0
|
0
|
209
|
POST
|
Hi @KevinBurke , Apologies on the delay. I will follow up more on this next week as I need to create other projects with similar forms for different areas. I will take a video of editing and also share a map with the ArcGISFieldMaps user in the group. Thanks for the outreach! Kathy
... View more
3 weeks ago
|
0
|
0
|
121
|
POST
|
Much appreciated! I also just renamed the pop-up title for a layer in MVB and this also removed the form on all layers. It doesn't seem like it takes much of a change in MVB at all for the form to disappear. Thanks for your help.
... View more
02-02-2021
03:39 PM
|
0
|
0
|
148
|
POST
|
Hi @KevinBurke , In creating another web map today in Map Viewer Beta and then configuring the form in Field Maps all was well until I realized I needed to add filters to the layers in MVB. After I did this, the forms were gone in Field Maps. I also wanted to add a label for one of the layers, this also removed the forms in Field Maps. I will let you know what else I find. Thanks, Kathy
... View more
02-02-2021
03:13 PM
|
0
|
0
|
151
|
POST
|
Thanks Colin for the information. I didn't realize this is expected behavior because when you define an offline map extent by creating a polygon it seems reasonable to think it is clipping all the layers in the map extent to your polygon. Could Esri please update this in the documentation? I would think for most people and from a data management standpoint it would be much cleaner of a workflow for the polygon defined in the offline map extent to clip out features that bleed over. It essentially does this for imagery basemaps and reference layers (like hybrid and ocean reference layers I use already. I am already sideloading the imagery basemap and would rather not have to slice up the larger polygon if possible. I appreciate the information, but I'm disappointed that this is expected behavior for features other than Esri features. Thanks, Kathy
... View more
02-02-2021
12:46 PM
|
0
|
1
|
105
|
Online Status |
Offline
|
Date Last Visited |
Saturday
|