Latest Contributions by AdministrátorJihlava

‎11-26-2020

Hello, have you already find a solution for storing a lot of data from Tracker? We're still seeing it and don't know how to prevent from saving this huge amount of data to mobile storage. It causes a problem to our users. Thanks for your help. Jana

‎08-11-2020

We're seeign it on Android devices. And we're experiencing it on all of devices, on which tracker runs. Yeah, but it seems something goes wrong with the process of deleting data from device.

‎08-10-2020

Jeff Shaner‌ please, haven't you experienced this behaviour yet?

Re: Survey123 App Logging User Out · ‎08-10-2020

We're having the same problem with multiple apps (Collector, Tracker and Quick Capture) - all of them are repeatedly signing of. Ismael Chivite‌ is there any solution for this issue? It would be very helpful for us. Thank you. Jane

‎08-05-2020

Have any of you experienced the situation, that Tracker stores a huge amounts of data to mobile storage - like 5 GB? Users work online whole time so I suppose that all data are sent to the server. In the documentation is mentioned that data are automatically deleted from device after 72 hours (or something like this). But this seems it's not deleting. When i look at memory storage, I can see a db file which is only a few MB big and anything else. I have no idea where is the rest of data and what kind of data it is. It's a huge problem for us, because our municipality police department are using tracker every day and we have to solve a problem with a lack of free space in mobile devices all the time. Can you help me with this problem? We use Tracker within ArcGIS Enterprise 10.7.1 and version 20.2.0

‎08-05-2020

Nápad aby bylo možné k jednomu záznamu v quick capture přidat víc než jednu fotku:

‎08-05-2020

It would be perfect to add more than one picture when capturing an incident.

‎08-05-2020

Hi, we use Arcade expression in a configuration of a pop-ups in web map. We're creating new custom field and use something like this: var uzivatel = $feature["created_user"] if (uzivatel == "mp_okrsek_mesto"){ return "Křišťál" } else if (uzivatel == "mp_okrsek_mesto2"){ return "Sobotka" } else return "Test" Hope it'll help. Jane

‎07-21-2020

Hi Jianxia, I have completely the same issue like Brett. I can't see any option to add a related record in WAB (no matter if I go via Editor widget or via popup). If I click on pencil button after related table row in pop up while editing, the window with loading symbol appears and gets suck and there is no option to come back but close the pop up window and open it again. I suppose there should be at least a plus and edit buttons. I tried to edit and add a related record into the same table (same service and webmap) through Collector and there is no problem. I can edit existing and even add a new related record. This is my FeatureServer service URL: ost/Ji_majetek_test (FeatureServer) . Can you please try to check where is the problem? Thank you in advance Jane

‎06-10-2020

Hello Xander, well, I'll try to contact our local technical support. Hopefully someone will help me. I also tried database sequence and it worked well until we found out that when someone delete last feature with a specific number (555 for example), next drawn feature will get next number 556 (not 555 as we need). We just need complete numeric serie without gaps. If you have any other idea how to solve this problem, I'd be happy. Thanks Jane

Online Status	Offline
Date Last Visited	2 weeks ago

My Ideas

Latest Contributions by AdministrátorJihlava

Re: Tracker for ArcGIS stores a lot of data to mobile storage

Re: Tracker for ArcGIS stores a lot of data to mobile storage

Re: Tracker for ArcGIS stores a lot of data to mobile storage

Re: Survey123 App Logging User Out

Tracker for ArcGIS stores a lot of data to mobile storage

Re: Pojďme diskutovat o Vašich nápadech

Add more than one photo to one record

Re: Displaying Real Name Instead Of UserName From Tracking Layer

Re: Issues with editing related tables in a web map and with widgets in WAB

Re: Attribute rule problem with feature layer with attachment