POST
|
Hey Hussein, I have figured out the issue, and it is not what I expected. You see, I'm working with two maps (locked vertically). One (right) contains a non-un service, and the other (left) has my un service. I use the non-un service as a migration comparison. Both services are hosted on the same server/portal but in different server directories. Same portal user. When I have both maps open side-by-side in Pro, validation times out. When I only have the UN map open, validation completes in 2-4 seconds on default. Kind of unexpected ...
... View more
11-19-2019
11:55 AM
|
0
|
0
|
190
|
POST
|
Hi Manuele, From the images: The edge-junction-edge rule highlighted is: from Busbar to Busbar via Fuse The edge-junction rule highlighted is: from Fuse to Conductor (and vice versa) Your map is showing Conductor to Fuse to Busbar. Hence it seems you are missing a rule Busbar to Fuse? (not via Fuse, as that would expect another Busbar at the other end of the Fuse)
... View more
11-15-2019
03:43 PM
|
5
|
0
|
52
|
POST
|
Hey Hussein, In regards to the workaround mentioned; I went back through my personal process log and noticed I had already tried that (CE) = Current Extent Thanks
... View more
11-15-2019
03:22 PM
|
0
|
0
|
190
|
POST
|
Hey Hussein, Thank you for your quick reply! To answer your questions: 1. What version of ArcGIS Server/Pro are you running? 10.7.1 w/ Pro 2.4.2 (UN Release 3) Most of the time, I'm resolving stacked points: 2. How many features (roughly in the 1:20 scale)? 18 3. How many dirty areas in the 1:20 scale? 56 (29 Point Errors, 27 Line Errors) As a clarification note, the same occurs with 3 features / 3 dirty areas @ 1:5 scale. 4. How many total error features you have in the utility network (you can find that out in network properties) 8,162 (less than 1% of total non-error features) In this particular scenario, I only have to delete one point (the stacked junction) and it will resolve all 56 errors. Thank you for your help!
... View more
11-15-2019
03:00 PM
|
0
|
0
|
190
|
POST
|
Hi, I'm seemingly and recently getting overwhelmed with a validation issue that reports as "Error: Unable to validate … because another session is validating". This happens after validation times out. Restarting ArcGIS Pro and/or the Service does not seem to change it. As if there is a cached session ... Disabling/Enabling Topology works ok, however, validation itself is timing out. I've reconfigured the time out parameters for the un service with no change. The ArcGIS Server is not reporting any issues ... In the logs, however, there is the following line mentioned (quite a few times): "com.esri.arcgis.discovery.json.JSONException: Expected a ':' after a key at character 38 of {guid}" The GUID does not seem to correspond to any feature. Could it be a red herring? I'm validating at current extent on SDE.DEFAULT with a scale of 1:20. The un itself is close to 1mil features, with appr. 8k of errors. I need validation to work to resolve them Is there a way to clear these validation sessions? Some seem to hang around for hours ... ( ... requestID="">guid is 173 minutes old) Any help is appreciated!
... View more
11-15-2019
11:21 AM
|
0
|
6
|
307
|
DOC
|
Will there be an update to UPDM 2018 that will include the changes for the April 2018 release of the Gas Utility Network Configuration or are they already included? Release notes for ArcGIS Pro 2.1—Get Started | ArcGIS for Gas
... View more
05-07-2018
09:53 AM
|
0
|
0
|
3741
|
POST
|
I wonder if installing patch 593 for the ArcFM Object Reader will resolve this particular problem? ArcFM Solution 10.2.1 Patch #593
... View more
01-05-2015
03:09 PM
|
0
|
0
|
32
|
POST
|
If you were still wondering about AAL and information in regards to it, you can find that here: ArcFM Advanced Labeling | exchange
... View more
11-21-2014
12:38 PM
|
0
|
0
|
13
|
POST
|
Yovav, I guess the System requirements would be your best bet. Furthermore, for each configuration I would test it first prior to implementing it across multiple systems. I don't think Esri is going to tell you: "use such and such GPU for best results." - Juul
... View more
11-11-2014
09:56 AM
|
0
|
1
|
80
|
POST
|
Thank you, Vandana!! Do you know when it is scheduled to be fixed? - Juul
... View more
11-04-2014
11:00 AM
|
0
|
0
|
12
|
Online Status |
Offline
|
Date Last Visited |
02-03-2021
01:21 PM
|