Latest Contributions by MartinHvidberg

‎03-30-2020

ArcGIS Pro er et stærkt værktøj, jeg er især glad for de mange forskellige geodata-analyse muligheder som følger med. Men det understøtter desværre ikke længere 'The Relation spatial relationship' også kaldet DE-9IM. Jeg har tidligere optrådt med ArcMap i både ESRI-brugerklubben og på Kortdage, og vist noget af det avancerede man kan med DE-9IM. (Types of spatial relationships that can be validated—Help | Documentation ) På ArcGIS Pro's onlinehjælp (https://pro.arcgis.com/en/pro-app/help/editing/geodatabase-topology-rules-for-polygon-features.htm) referererer de tilbage til den, i øvrigt fantastiske, gamle plakat fra ArcMap: https://pro.arcgis.com/en/pro-app/help/editing/pdf/topology_rules_poster.pdf - men DE-9IM er desværre ikke en del af det konceptet. Konklusionen er, at DE-9IM er forsvundet ud at ESRI, fra ArcMap til ArcGIS Pro. Det er et tab af vigtig functionalitet. Derfor har jeg skrevet et forslag på ESRI's Ideas som jeg håber mange vil have lyst til at 'Vote' op 🙂 Klik her for at læse forslaget:Give us back 'The Relation spatial relationship', i.e. DE-9IM #

‎03-30-2020

When doing spatial selections, you traditionally have options like Intersect, Contains, Boundary touches, and many, many more. But some times that is just not enough... You need that special relation, that ESRI apparently haven’t thought about. In these cases, we used to have 'The Relation spatial relationship' to handle the situation. 'The Relation spatial relationship' is ESRI's name for what is also known as DE-9IM (ref. 1) and have been included in Arc Desktop as resent as ArcMap 10.8 (ref. 2) But it has disappeared with the introduction of ArcGIS Pro? My national ESRI reseller confirms this, but I have not seen any reply from ESRI Int. I would like to suggest that 'The Relation spatial relationship' gets re-introduced, in all situations in ArcGIS Pro where you can select options like Intersect, Contains, Boundary touches, etc. It was one of your strongest tools, and we think it's cool. Here are a few examples (ref.2.) of increasingly advanced stuff, that can be done with 'The Relation spatial relationship'. Please ESRI - Give us 'The Relation spatial relationship' back! ref.1: DE-9IM - Wikipedia ref.2: Types of spatial relationships that can be validated—Help | Documentation

‎08-31-2015

What you want is likely an 'Editor' object ArcGIS Help (10.2, 10.2.1, and 10.2.2) .. resources.arcgis.com/en/help/main/10.2/index.html#//00s300000008000000 /Martin

‎04-12-2015

I didn't consider classic topology at first, since data is in a versioned enterprise sde (Esri classic topology won't work with versioned databases). But I guess it's a good solution, if I make a 'check out replica' it should work smoothly. Thanks M

‎04-11-2015

It seems to me that this should be a quite simple challenge. I have a feature class 'River'. Unfortunately it was digitized without much attention to snapping, therefore it has many small gaps, typically less that 1 meter. In the very old days of Arc/Info a simple 'snap' command would have fixed this quickly ... So I assumed it to be equally simple in ArcMap 10.3 I found the tool 'Snap (Editing)' but it doesn't seem to do anything. What is the easiest way to close many small gaps like this. /Martin

‎10-23-2014

Hi Duncan I still find this to be a pain... But what I really want to add is: If you have your .pyt import a .py and you are then editing the .py then you need to reload recursively. How to do that is described here: Is there a way to refresh imported modules in a ArcGIS Python Toolbox? - Geographic Information Systems Stack Exchange Best regards Martin

‎10-16-2014

This talk seems to repeat itself, for every new version. Essentially: If the documentation exists internally in esri, why is it not made available to the user? I would still like to know that.!

‎09-30-2014

for the record: I had used 'refresh toolbox' many times during the edits, so that was not the problem. / M

‎09-30-2014

Thanks for your reply. I restarted ArcMap, and now everything works exactely as expected 🙂 ??? / Martin

‎09-30-2014

Hi Thomas - nice to hear from you... Unfortunately that line is the solution to an earlier problem Re: in a pyt (python toolbox): How do I make a boolean parameter default False??? so I would like to keep it. / Martin

Online Status	Offline
Date Last Visited	‎11-11-2020 02:23 AM

My Ideas

Latest Contributions by MartinHvidberg

Jeg savner 'The Relation spatial relationship' i ArcGIS Pro

Give us back 'The Relation spatial relationship', i.e. DE-9IM

Re: How can i start the edit session for a layer warehoused in a geodatabase

Re: how to close small gaps in a river network

how to close small gaps in a river network

Re: How do you reload a module imported into a Python Toolbox?

Re: ArcGIS 10.1 arcpy Wall Reference

Re: in pyt (Python Toolbox) why can't I make the parameter Optional?

Re: in pyt (Python Toolbox) why can't I make the parameter Optional?

Re: in pyt (Python Toolbox) why can't I make the parameter Optional?