POST
|
Yes! Sorry I didn't come back to let folks know. What I ended up doing was re-doing the join and *not* creating a view out of it. I created a new feature service layer. That worked fine. However, the attachments didn't come along. That's another hurdle I have to figure out. 😕
... View more
05-28-2020
08:14 AM
|
0
|
0
|
141
|
POST
|
I'm having this problem too. The bug page says that it has been fixed. But I just performed a join and the attachments didn't come through. Has anyone figured out an elegant work-around?
... View more
05-19-2020
01:23 PM
|
1
|
0
|
479
|
POST
|
Hello James, Sorry I didn't respond until now. I've successfully been able to join the two databases and create an entirely new feature service, but some stuff gets left behind. Here's what I'm doing : In an online map, I add both databases (one is the request for the evaluation, the other is the matching evaluation) I click on Analysis, then Summarize Data, then Join Features. The Target Layer is the evaluation because it has the geopoint and the picture. The layer to join to the target layer is the request - has the owner's name. I then click on the 'Choose the field to match' option and pick the street address in both. This is a one to one option, so that's all good. I get it a name and uncheck 'Use current map extent' and I leave the 'Create results as hosted feature layer view' unchecked. Then I click on RUN ANALYSIS. After a little bit, my new feature layer is added to the map (yay!). I can then create a new survey using this feature layer from within Survey123 Connect (desktop) - another yay! Unfortunately, not everything comes across to the new feature service. Most importantly: the pictures from the evaluation and all the domain/list stuff for all the attributes (over 70 attributes!). Is there anyway for all that to be copied over to the new feature service (without me adding it one record or one attribute at a time)? Thanks, Esther
... View more
05-19-2020
01:14 PM
|
0
|
0
|
42
|
POST
|
Here's the set up: I have a vegetation layer I'm showing on a web map. When zoomed out, I have the data categorized in broad vegetation categories (conifer forest, hardwood forest, shrubland, grassland, etc). When zoomed in, I then have the map switch over to another view of the vegetation layer (using the visibility limits for each layer view) showing more specificity (species name, actually). Here's the problem: how do I get the color scheme I have in ArcMap (took forever, there's 70 species) up onto ArcGIS Online in a format I can then apply to that "zoomed in" vegetation layer? I don't want to re-publish the layer because it is rather large. I just want to use the color scheme. Trying to pick colors for more than 70 categories in ArcGIS Online may likely kill me. And the random colors are terrible. And the species colors need to closely match the broad category colors which was relatively easy to do in ArcMap.
... View more
04-24-2020
09:37 AM
|
0
|
0
|
34
|
POST
|
Hello, I'm having trouble joining surveys and making them available while still retaining all the features from the original surveys (i.e. multiple choice options). I've tried joining them and creating a feature service *view* and creating a new survey based on that view, but that doesn't allow me to share the new survey with a group in my organization. (I just want them to be able to filter the data and create reports, not add new records or edit the database, but maybe that would be good too.) Anyway, when I join without creating a feature service view (creating an entirely separate feature service layer), I lose all the back-end stuff like whether the question was a multiple choice question or drop-down. All the fields are just text. Which is fine, but when I create a report, I don't get the option to get those nifty check boxes. Plus, some of the text answers are obscure, like, 10_20_feet when it should show as 10 - 20 feet. What work flow would you all suggest to maintain the data and functionality of the original surveys?
... View more
04-16-2020
11:57 AM
|
0
|
2
|
157
|
POST
|
Thank you, Zach! I'll try that. I did share the contents of the Survey's folder with my group, hoping that it would show up for this automagically, but that didn't work. However, I didn't try deleting that stakeholder file. I might try that. But, while trying to figure it out, I realized I created the join as a 'feature layer view' - which means no editing. But I don't want to edit. I like the fact that folks can't edit it. I just want them to be able to use the Data and Analysis tabs in Survey123. I'll figure it out, one way or another. Either I'll try deleting the stakeholder file in the folder or just creating a new join that isn't a 'view'. Thanks again!
... View more
04-16-2020
09:25 AM
|
0
|
0
|
141
|
POST
|
Hello, In ArcGIS Online, I have joined two survey databases on a common field and saved it as a new feature service layer. (Yay! So happy that worked.) Then, in Survey123 Connect, I created a new survey form based on that new feature service layer. I was able to successfully publish it. (Another yay!) But, now I can't share it with anyone. I get this message: Any clues?
... View more
04-16-2020
09:00 AM
|
0
|
4
|
271
|
POST
|
Thank you! I'll read through all the steps and make the attempt tomorrow. Fingers crossed!
... View more
04-09-2020
09:55 AM
|
0
|
0
|
156
|
POST
|
Add on question, what if the surveys are already published and currently in use? Might I still be able to somehow merge the two? They wouldn't have to use the merged database as a survey, but rather just generate reports from it. Any advice for that scenario?
... View more
04-09-2020
08:29 AM
|
0
|
0
|
156
|
POST
|
Hello, I'm putting together an Experience site for a public document. The document (a community wildfire protection plan) will be presented in a series of pages. Some of the pages will be text, others will just be links to documents and/or other website pages. Some will be interactive maps (of course). We'd like for some of the pages/maps/links to be password protected until they are ready to share with the public. Does anyone know if that's possible? I've organized my pages/links into two folders: Public Content and Stakeholder Content. As far as I can tell, the folders are just extra text. I can't actually set any properties for those folders. Is that correct? Can anyone suggest another way I should be organizing the Experience?
... View more
04-07-2020
04:35 PM
|
0
|
1
|
127
|
Online Status |
Offline
|
Date Last Visited |
3 weeks ago
|