|
POST
|
@TerezaČernohousová I believe a point only appears when an Occupant is assigned to a Unit, not a Workspace Area. For Workspace areas it just adds a value to the Area ID field in the Occupants feature, in order to relate it to the Areas table.
... View more
5m ago
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
POST
|
@MollyE Can you elaborate on the solution, please? I haven't found any settings related to labels in the Space Planner app
... View more
10m ago
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
|
POST
|
I've run into a potentially undocumented limitation with Joined Views and Experience Builder, and am wondering if anyone has run into this before or could replicate/enlighten. As a simplified example—say I have an ExB app with just a Filter widget and a Table widget. The Table widget has two Sheets in it, and both sheets point to different Joined Views which share a common join layer (an ArcGIS Online hosted feature layer (Layer A)) but use different target layers in their joins (two other ArcGIS Online hosted feature layers (Layer B and Layer C)). So one Joined View is Layer A + Layer B and the other is Layer A + Layer C. Layer B and Layer C both share a field that contains common data, let's say colors, as an example. The Color field in both Layer B and Layer C are string fields and do not use Domains, however the Values inside the field do match across both layers. So there is a "Red" in both fields of both layers, a "Green", etc. etc. The only difference between the fields is the name (example: one is "Color" and another is "Colour"). I set up my Filter widget to have a Group Filter set up to "Ask for Values" (Unique), using the Color/Colour fields from my Joined Views. When I go to test, I get a dropdown for Colors as expected and select my choice. In the Table widget, however, only one of the sheets gets filtered. Whichever Joined View in the Group SQL Expression that was used as the "Main field" gets filtered in the table, while the other does not. If I switch the "Main field" in the expression to use the other Joined View, then the other sheet gets filtered in the table, and not the first. Unlike single data filters (non-Group Filters), I can't actually see what the underlying SQL looks like, so I'm unsure if the cause is just that the underlying field name is different across both views. I've never run into that issue using two hosted feature layers, rather than Joined Views. That seems to be the whole point of the Group SQL Expression builder, letting you map values to the filter across different fields. I suspect it's a limitation of using Joined Views, but haven't seen that documented anywhere and I'm hoping that someone can confirm.
... View more
yesterday
|
0
|
0
|
57
|
|
BLOG
|
Cool feature. Are there any size limits to the Frames length and/or resulting video file sizes to be aware of?
... View more
yesterday
|
0
|
0
|
20
|
|
POST
|
I'm seeing this in ExB as well (ArcGIS Online, not Enterprise)—specifically using a "filter" widget that asks the user to choose values from a dropdown list. The options show the codes rather than the labels. The datasource for the filter is coming via a web map. I have noticed that if I add the hosted feature layer as a datasource directly, rather than going through a web map, then the labels are displayed as desired. This isn't a good work around, however, if you need the filter to interact with a map widget. I also noticed that the issue only happens on a specific field within my source layer. If I build the filter on other fields that have domains (regardless of whether the datasource comes through a web map or goes to the hosted feature layer directly) they show the labels instead of the codes, as desired. To me this seems to indicate there may be an issue or setting set in the web map causing this—but I've been unable to find what. Very weird.
... View more
Wednesday
|
0
|
0
|
14
|
|
POST
|
@KyleKeath Standard vs Advanced shouldn't make a difference in enabling floor aware data, so far as I know. Here is the license config info. (You do need Network and 3D Analyst if you're doing Indoor routing stuff). Not sure where exactly in the process you are running into an issue, but you configure the floor aware data within the web map properties. Your services need to be floor-aware too. In ArcGIS Online if you go to your content and look at the hosted feature layer item with all your indoors data, it will specifically say if it is an Indoors Hosted Feature layer instead of just a normal hosted feature layer. To get it to do that, you need to configure a floor-aware map in ArcGIS Pro and publish it as a service. To configure a map in Pro to be floor aware, you need to go into the map properties, find the 'Indoor Layers' section and choose your Site, Facilities, and Levels layers. Then publish the whole map as one hosted feature service with all your indoors layers together.
... View more
a week ago
|
0
|
0
|
84
|
|
POST
|
@ABraun The gif in that linked thread is still accurate, but you're next step would be to put your 3 layers into a group. You can create a group by clicking the ... button to the right of any of those layers and choosing "Group" at the bottom of the menu that appears. Expand the new "Group" layer that was created in the Layers panel and you'll see your one layer inside of it. Next, drag the other two layers inside of the group as well (using the six dot handle to the left of the layer name, or you can click the ... button to the right of the layer name again and choose the "Move" option). Sometimes the Move option is easier, as getting the layer to go inside of the group instead of below it via drag can be finicky. You'll know the layer is inside the group if it is indented below the Group Layer row. Once they are all in a group, click on the Group Layer row and go to the Properties tab on the far right of the screen. Scroll down to the visibility section and toggle on the "Exclusive visibility" option. The layers in your group will now have radio button toggles.
... View more
a week ago
|
3
|
1
|
256
|
|
POST
|
@ABraun I thought you were looking at doing this in the basic Map Viewer. It still works there, I just tested it myself. Unsure what happens if you then put it into another app though, like Experience Builder.
... View more
a week ago
|
1
|
1
|
261
|
|
POST
|
@TerezaČernohousová wrote: How does the Indoor Viewer identify me in the list of employees? Is it based on my name - Know As field? @TerezaČernohousová I believe it's based on the Occupants' layer "Email" field, and the app looks to match with the email associated with the user's ArcGIS Online account, which can be found on the account's Profile page.
... View more
a week ago
|
0
|
4
|
99
|
|
POST
|
@ABraun Did you try this? Re: Layer list | grouping layers with radio button... - Esri Community
... View more
a week ago
|
1
|
3
|
277
|
|
POST
|
I think this is more a limitation of the Map Viewer rather than Indoors/Space Planner specifically. All assigned Occupants just become a point at the center of the assigned room in terms of geometry, and the label overlap options are still limited-to-nonexistent in the Map Viewer. I'm not sure of a way you could do this without getting really complicated—maybe creating joined views between Units/Occupants or creating static copies of your Units layer with matching Occupant names all concatenated into a single field. If you were doing this for a custom dashboard or something that might be okay, but with the Space Planner app or Indoors Viewer, that's not going to fly.
... View more
a week ago
|
0
|
0
|
35
|
|
POST
|
Hi @MollyE, I was confused by this for a while, too. What we eventually learned was that the "Meeting Room" code for Assignment Type is really only meant to be used with the Reservations layer and when the rooms are assigned to a workspace area. The Space Planner is setting them back to "none" because it sees they are not actually assigned to anything (in this case, a workspace area), and so it's trying to clean up your data for you during the merge. It doesn't look at that field as a room type attribute at all, it is only concerned with whether it is actively assigned or not to a person or workspace area. Personally, I think it should be called Assignment Status rather than Assignment Type, and the codes can be thought of as: Default More Like Office Assigned Office None Unassigned Office/Desk/Hotel/Meeting Room Hot Desk Assigned Hot Desk Hotel Assigned Hotel Meeting Room Assigned Meeting Room Not Assignable Not Assignable Related (because we had similar confusion around it), the Reservation Method field only applies when using the built-in Reservations layer as well, and has no purpose if you are integrating with Office 365 for reservations. Initially we wanted to do that same thing as you and tried to make the Assignment Type field multi-purpose and use it as an attribute field for room type, but I would recommend relying on the USE_TYPE field instead and letting the Assignment Type field be handled entirely by the Space Planner app (apart from your initial floor set-up, anyway). Trying to manually calculate any value there other than 'none' or 'not assignable' will lead to conflicts with Space Planner. In our case, our meeting rooms are not restricted to reservation by specific teams, so we just have them all set to "not assignable" for now. In terms of symbolization—in the Space Planner app we have Units symbolized based on Assignment Type because we only wanted to highlight desk/office availability, and so the meeting rooms are just white along with all the other common areas (corridors, bathrooms, etc.). In the Viewer app, where our folks do want to see the meeting rooms more easily so they can book, we're symbolizing based on the USE_TYPE, and we have a couple of different values for meeting rooms types (conference, enclave) that are then merged together in the Map Viewer Style options as one "Meeting Room" type, so that they only show up as one listing in the legend. Hope that helps
... View more
a week ago
|
1
|
1
|
101
|
|
IDEA
|
@JenniferCadkin Woo! Awesome, I'm looking forward to trying it out. Thanks for the update.
... View more
a week ago
|
0
|
0
|
145
|
|
POST
|
I'm seeing this issue as well, but while using a script and the ArcGIS API for Python to update data sources in an ExB app, rather than manually through the ArcGIS Assistant. The script swaps the config.json file entirely via resources.remove() and resources.add(). Edit: To add, I can confirm that Luci's manual workaround does work. Might not be feasible if you were trying to automate something entirely on a schedule, but for as-needed updates, it's a relatively quick fix.
... View more
2 weeks ago
|
1
|
0
|
112
|
| Title | Kudos | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | yesterday | |
| 1 | 2 weeks ago | |
| 1 | 09-17-2025 10:59 AM | |
| 1 | 09-17-2025 11:03 AM | |
| 3 | a week ago |
| Online Status |
Online
|
| Date Last Visited |
23m ago
|