- Home
- :
- All Communities
- :
- User Groups
- :
- Roads and Highways User Group (RHUG)
- :
- Documents
- :
- RH_User_Group_March_2019.pdf
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark as New
- Mark as Read
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Report Inappropriate Content
RH_User_Group_March_2019.pdf
Recorded meeting https://meetny.webex.com/meetny/lsr.php?RCID=195ca2b57ec645dc9cfc13f1978470b9
Chat window:
from Jeromy to everyone:
@Nicole ITD - Are your SME's entering the data within RCE located in other places other than your HQ building? ex. In other Idaho DOT buildings...districts, areas...
from Nicole (ITD) to everyone:
Yes, we have people in the HQ building, and in district buildings entering data into RCE. The furtherest right now is in Shoshone (its about the middle of the "fat" part of Idaho.
from Nicole (ITD) to everyone:
The end goal is to have all the districts entering data into RCE, and also the Local Highway Districts (LHD) entering data through redlining (using R&H, but it's an external app that'll be created as the LHD are not internal to ITD.
from Jeromy to everyone:
Good stuff...might hit y'all up later regarding performance and dealing with locks among "disconnected" users. And yeh, we are in the process of opening up our Redline semi public facing...good time;] Thanks.
from Kevin Hunt to everyone:
New York is in the process of loading capital project locations from the past into R&H so we would also be interested in a standardized tool to "backdate" events in R&H.
from Nicole (ITD) to everyone:
No probs! I'll be at GIS-T if you want to chat then too?
from Jeromy to everyone:
For sure...I will be there.
from Patrick Whiteford to everyone:
I would like to touch base at GIS-T on this too.
from Nicole (ITD) to everyone:
Sounds good Patrick!
from Jeromy to everyone:
Good with me. Looking forward to it.
from Ryan to everyone:
I would love to be part of this discussion with you all too!
from Jeromy to everyone:
I can grab everyones email from Patrick and get times from everyone...and plan a quick discussion
from Michael Clement to everyone:
Iowa wants temporality to stay, we use it a lot
from Nicole (ITD) to everyone:
Idaho isn't concerned about going back intime to make edits.
from MnDOT to everyone:
Minnesota will also be a part of the discussion at GIS-T
from Jeromy to everyone:
@MnDOT - Alright the more the merrier!
from Nicole (ITD) to everyone:
There's a lot of good places around there that we can meet and chat.
from Steve H. - Maricopa County to everyone:
We would like to have a route/referent geocoder. We would also like to have it as an AGS service.
from Claire Inbody to everyone:
It would be useful for local projects at Nebraska DOT. Due to lack of information for the projects (we wont have a route and log mile for it)
from Steve H. - Maricopa County to everyone:
Mic isn't working sorry.
from Steve H. - Maricopa County to everyone:
All of our events are located by route/referent. Not measures!
from Steve H. - Maricopa County to everyone:
Measures mean nothing to our SME's. They all understand "on road", "from referent offset" and "to referent offset". This is how we capture event locations.
from Steve H. - Maricopa County to everyone:
We do have a python lrs geocoder but it would be nice to have one out of the box.
from Claire Inbody to everyone:
Yes I would like to see what you have.
from Tom Tyndall to everyone:
Tom Tyndall's email is : ttyndall@azdot.gov
from Blaine Hackett to everyone:
Yes, very helpful
from Claire Inbody to everyone:
Yes great to hear what folks are doing
from Jeromy to everyone:
I thought it went great man! Thanks!
from MnDOT to everyone:
Great format and discussions today!
