yes sir
at the time of compile it failed.
did you do the incremental tests as I had suggested to see if it fails even with one buffer? I know you want them all...but if it fails on the first, then flailing around trying to get them all to work isn't a good game plan
Dear sir
the buffer type is overlapping and no of buffer is 13
1.input feature----polygon file
2.output feature class----feature class
3. distances--15, 50 150,300,500,1000,5000,10000,15000,20000,100000,300000
4.Buffer_Unit----meter
5.Field_Name--distance
6.Dissolve_Option---all
7.Outside_Polygons_Only---uncheked

the error message is like that.
Can you provide what was used for the options described in the help...
http://desktop.arcgis.com/en/desktop/latest/tools/analysis-toolbox/multiple-ring-buffer.htm
if you are using a tool, then a screen grab would be useful.
If you are accessing via code, then the requirements in the help topic and any sample code would be useful
Saw your image on another thread.
Either the data are:
Other things to try:
Dear sir
The file is much more big, so i divided it into 3 part and then reproject them properly, and then tried. i have tried many times and noticed that the more value of multiring buffer i.e. 10000, 1000, 5000etc meter formed sucessfully but not the 15, 100, 200meter buffer distance.
your 1st suggestion i couldnot get it properly so please describe properly.
thank you sir for your valluable reply
1.when i apply a single layer buffer file it works for every distance but for all layers at a time it failed.
2.sometimes i gave outputfile name like ''E:\himalayalitan\New Folder (2)\New folder\111.shp''
''C:\Users\admin\Documents\ArcGIS\Default1.gdb\projec2_MultipleRingBuffer2''
3.i dont know at what limit it stop working but the output always like ''failed in multiringbuffer'' for trying all layes at a time.
when i apply repair geometry tool it failed. i am attaching that file.
Hi Litan,
I suggest you stay on a single thread on a particular issue. Just reply on this thread rather than creating new thread.
I am also including the other two threads of yours regarding the above issue for others' understanding