Select to view content in your preferred language

The Vertical Datum: Or is that Mean Sea level?

18576
6
08-14-2014 08:05 AM
SimonKettle
Frequent Contributor
2 6 18.6K

What is a Vertical Datum?

The Geodetic Glossary (2009) defines height as ‘distance, measured along a perpendicular, between a point and a reference surface’. This definition is concise and direct but leaves a vagueness concerning the reference surface. This reference surface is the Vertical Datum. A datum is required to reach accurate and reliable measures of height above a surface.

The EPSG dataset currently lists 128 vertical datums worldwide. There are various types of height including:

  • Ellipsoidal (The difference between the topographic elevation and the ellipsoid)
  • Orthometric (The difference between the topographic elevation and the geoid)
  • Geoid (The difference between the ellipsoidal height and the geoid surface Note this can be negative)

Heights are categorized into two types, those with reference to the Earth's gravity field and those defined on geometry alone. It is important to note that the two categories of height are not directly interchangeable as they are completely different. Where the gravity field heights are based on the geoid that is defined by a eqipotential surface‌ compared to, for example, the height of a tree using right angle geometry where ground level is defined as 0 height.

DifferenceInHeights.png

Figure 1 Difference between the Geoid and Spheroid/Ellipsoid based surfaces and real topography (adapted from ESRI 2012) where h = Ellipsoidal height, N = Orthomatric height and H = Geoid height.

In my experience height is colloquially referred to as X units above or below Mean Seal Level (MSL). Sea level comes from the Earth' gravity field, therefore gravity is studied to understand height.

So, what is mean sea level?

In its simplest form MSL is the average location for the surface of the ocean measured over time to minimise random and periodic variation, such as tides and storm surges. The period of time to measure these variations in the ocean surface was set at 19 years by the U.S. National Ocean Surface, these measurements can be brought together to form a tidal datum.

However in this form MSL is not adequate as a global vertical datum as this mean calculation only exists at the station of measurement and its immediate vicinity, plus the ocean has a dynamic topography that is nicely summarised in this MinutePhysics video.

What is Sea Level? - YouTube

Why is a Vertical Datum important?

I work in the Oil and Gas industry and the application of a correct vertical datum is important in exploration, when defining a height or depth to a geological surface, and also when designing and implementing infrastructure projects such as pipelines, ports and other coastal infrastructure as well as when considering the environmental impacts that spills and other developments may have on coastlines and rivers. For example misunderstanding the vertical datum can impact planning for a storm surge that may have been measured on a different surface when compared to the height of a constructed LNG plant.

In essence there are 2 types of datums used in Vertical Coordinate Reference Systems:

Geoid-based versus Spheroid/Ellipsoid-based

The Geoid is a reference surface of the Earth and is based on the relationship between gravitational force and gravitational potential that produces a surface where all points are perpendicular to the force of gravity. Meyer (2010) provides an extensive review on the Geoid and the physics behind its construction. This surface is considered the proper surface to create geodetic heights and will nominally correspond to mean sea-level (see the previous video).

Recently there has been a move to see if data from the Gravity field and steady-state Ocean Circulation Explorer (GOCE) ESA project is able to be used with calculating heights and connecting height systems (see here). This will create a very high resolution Geoid for calculating heights across the globe.

Some examples of Geoid surfaces include:

  • EGM2008 Geoid
  • EGM84 Geoid
  • EGM96 Geoid

Spheroid/Ellipsoid-based surfaces use geometric calculations to define  the local datum and a spheroid.

It is important to note that it is impossible to transform between the geoid and Spheroid/Ellipsoid-based datums. This is because there are no common elements between the two reference systems and  no site-specific gravity measurements in a spheroid/ellipsoid system so no mathematical transformation can be applied.

Some examples of Spheroidal/Ellipsoid-based surfaces found in ArcGIS 10.2 include:

  • D_Cyprus_Geodetic_Reference_System_1993
  • D_Kuwait_Oil_Company
  • D_St_Lucia_1955

ArcGIS_VD.png

Figure 2 Example of the difference parts that make up a Vertical Datum as presented in ArcGIS.

The Geoid has a more complex surface than a Spheroid/Ellipsoid-based surface where the Spheroid/Ellipsoid-based surface shows a constant rate between chosen parameters of calculation whilst the geoid is ‘bumpy’ indicating the changing gravity measurements that represent the ‘real’ topography of the Earth (Figure 3).

EGM96_Geoid.png

Figure 3 The EGM96 Geoid. Taken from Wikipedia.

How do you set a vertical coordinate system in ArcGIS

When creating a new feature class tick the “Coordinates include Z values” option. This will enable the 3D measure of the feature class (Figure 4).

Enabling_Z.png

Figure 4 New Feature Class: Select Z values to enable 3D use

Click ‘Next’ to select the Geographic/Projected Coordinate System you want to use and then select the Vertical Coordinate System you would like to use.

Selecting a Vertical Datum.png

Figure 5. Choose the correct vertical coordinate system for you area of interest. Note that local Vertical CRS have been calculated from locally derived measurements and that MSL (Depth) and MSL (Height) use the EGM96 Geoid.

Summary and How to transform between Vertical Coordinate Reference Systems in ArcGIS?

Geoid-based vertical coordinate reference systems are lightly connected to their geographic coordinate system (GCS) and therefore almost any Geoid-based vertical coordinate reference system may be used with any GCS since they include a vertical datum as part of their definition.

Spheroid/Ellipsoid-based coordinate reference system defines heights that are referenced to the spheroid of a geographic coordinate system. A geographic coordinate system’s spheroid may fall above or below the actual earth surface due to the mathematic parameters used in calculating the surface.

A Spheroid/Ellipsoid-based coordinate reference includes a datum, rather than a vertical datum definition and hence will follow those transformations used when switching between different GCS and PCS (Project Coordinate Reference Systems).

References

Meyer, T. H., 2010. Introduction to Geometrical and Physical Geodesy: Foundations of Geomatics. ESRI...

6 Comments
DavidMuthami1
Regular Contributor

This is a great article.

My questions is whether their exists a geoidal undulation N=h-H map for the globe that can allow me to a certain degree of accuracy convert my GPS ellipsoidal height to an orthometric height.

SimonKettle
Frequent Contributor

Hi David Thanks! I'm glad you've found it useful.

I believe there is a geoidal undulation map based on the WGS84 ellipsoid, as your using GPS the spheroid will be WGS84, here on the US Naval Academy Site

ww15mgh.jpg

DavidMuthami1
Regular Contributor

Hi Simon,

This is very helpful. Am sure in the course of time. 15'x15' geoid undulation will improve.

DuncanHornby
MVP Notable Contributor

Simon,

Thanks for this informative blog. I found it as I was thinking I would like to see a practical example of what happens when you set the vertical coordinate system in ArcGIS. I was creating a mosaic dataset from SRTM and decided to set its vertical coordinates to the EGM96 (something I have never done) to see what happens. Not a lot, I thought something magical would happen say in ArcScene but discovered ArcScene does not support Mosaic datasets!

I had worked out that turning on Z allowed me to set a vertical coordinate system of a FeatureClass but so what? Now I know I am showing my ignorance here but what does setting a vertical coordinate system allow you to do/ change in ArcMap? Could you write another short and snappy blog page showing the benefits of setting a vertical coordinate system in a FeatureClass?

SimonKettle
Frequent Contributor

Hi Duncan,

Thanks for your comment on the blog. To answer your question, enabling and setting the Z component of a feature class allows you to create and edit features that incorporate a third dimension (i.e. depth/height). That third dimension is defined by a Vertical Coordinate Reference System.

Without defining a vertical reference system on a feature class you can only extrude or drap features from their 2D location (http://resources.arcgis.com/en/help/main/10.1/index.html#/About_3D_features/00q800000075000000/ )

Choosing the Vertical Coordinate Reference System will not make any visible changes to your data set when viewed in ArcScene this is because you are merely assigning a vertical datum to the dataset e.g. you are designating upon what reference plane height is to be assigned.

For example if I create a new well in the North Sea to include a 3D element (e.g. a borehole) I would go ahead and create a new polyline Feature Class in the usual fashion with Z enabled and assign a vertical reference (e.g. European Vertical Reference Frame (EVRS), 2007 a gravity-related system; similar in construct to EGM96) I can now construct 3D features that reference EVRS 2007.

Applying Z and defining the vCRS allows you to work and edit features in 3D…

blog_blockdiags2_image7.jpg

Taken from:

Creating Geological Block Diagrams 2 - Exprodat Blog -

How to create vectors in a feature that have Z enabled - have a look at this ESRI help page: ArcGIS Help (10.2, 10.2.1, and 10.2.2)

In a similar fashion to a 2D projection (where geographic coordinates are not unique) mismatchs in height/depth might occur if, for example, elevation data was collected via GNSS (which refernces an ellipsoidal surface) and is displayed in an orthometric height system within a map.

This difference may be negliable at first glance however, this depends on what you are using the data for…an engineering project may require heights with an accuracy of sub-meter scale whilst general display of a stratigraphy will require less accuracy.

ArdenLarberg1
New Contributor

Hi Simon, this was really informative, and I plan on linking it in our intraweb tips page. I do have a question though - and hopefully you'll see this, since the post is a little old - but I'm working with publicly accessible formation tops data from wells and have them all in TVD subsea. What vertical reference system would you suggest? And do you have any experience with this in Pro? I'm annoyed that to get my surfaces to look right in 3D I have to add the elevation back and drape from ground level.

About the Author
Geologist, Geospatial Expert and TAP Certified GIS Trainer working as an Independant Consultant. I have special interests in Geology, Exploration, Coordinate Reference Systems, Geodesy and Natural Science.