Select to view content in your preferred language

Isolation trace taking out entire subnetwork

789
7
10-19-2023 12:59 AM
SamDeLore
New Contributor II

Hi all,

We've run into some strange results when performing isolation traces. 

A bit about our UN: 

  • Water Utility (Hierarchical/Mesh/Source)
  • UN 5, Pro 2.9.10, Enterprise 10.9.1 (latest patches)

The issue seems to trigger when a directional device within a loop is isolated by an Isolation trace. It looks like the system correctly recognises that the upstream of a device is without flow and therefore should extend the isolation downstream of that device. Now because the downstream has another path back to the controller, the isolation is reaching the controller and then taking out the entire supply zone (at least that's how I'm interpreting this result)

In reality, because the downstream side has another path back to the controller, flow should actually be able to reach the southern loop even with the isolation in place to the north. 

Things I've tried so far:

  • Removing the directional device (Gives correct result)
  • Making the directional device a controller (not a good solution and didn't work anyway)
  • Deploying into enterprise 11.1 with a version 6 UN (Same issue)

SamDeLore_0-1697694660861.pngSamDeLore_1-1697694668772.png

CC: @RudyProsser 

0 Kudos
7 Replies
Cash_Eddy
New Contributor

Hi Sam,

 

I looked at your data and noticed that there was not a Utility Network present with a network topology, only an asset package. Has the AP been applied to a staged UN?

 

Cash Eddy

Axim Geospatial LLC

0 Kudos
SamDeLore
New Contributor II

Hi Cash,

My bad, I've updated the attachment, a bit of late night asset package hackery going on..🙄

0 Kudos
RobertKrisher
Esri Regular Contributor

This is not the expected behavior; I'd recommend you work with support to log an issue for this.

SamDeLore
New Contributor II

Thanks @RobertKrisher,

We'll proceed to escalate the issue to support.

0 Kudos
MikeMillerGIS
Esri Frequent Contributor
Can you verify that you are using a source and not a sink based hierarchical network.
0 Kudos
SamDeLore
New Contributor II

Hi Mike,

Yes, Source based.

SamDeLore_0-1697760759523.png

 

0 Kudos
SamDeLore
New Contributor II

Some additional information.

When run in ArcGIS Pro 2.9.1, 2.9.5 & 3.0.3 the trace works,

When run in 2.9.10 & 3.1.3 the issue above appears