I would almost go even further and consider pre-set up layer files that are attached to the Geodatabase as opposed to a separate file. That being said, there could be an issue if the layer had some issues with such as all of the colors being transparent.
Seems like a good idea, one can already set the alias of a FeatureClass under the Data Source section. So I'm sure adding the display field would be possible but ESRI would have have to consider any changes to the main application code to pick up on any field set as display field?
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
