Select to view content in your preferred language

Zoom on Grouped Point Features

155
1
Jump to solution
03-20-2025 01:45 PM
CodyPatterson
MVP Regular Contributor

Hey all,

I'm curious if it's possible to use the Zoom feature on grouped point values? I'm attempting to have address values be able to be zoomed to, these values are grouped as there may be an occasional duplicated job number added to these features by the people entering them, and they may be grouped as they're in the same apartment building for example.

When not grouped I see this:

CodyPatterson_0-1742503427982.png

When grouped, I see this:

CodyPatterson_1-1742503453371.png

If this is something not able to be done, can a custom widget or similar be created to make this possible? It seems odd that the ability to zoom to grouped values wouldn't be possible, when it is possible on the AGOL webmaps and ArcGIS Pro.

As an update, this idea is not implemented in 11.2 enterprise seemingly: https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-dashboards-ideas/operations-dashboard-add-quot-zoom-to-quot-to/...

Thanks in advance!

Cody

0 Kudos
1 Solution

Accepted Solutions
CodyPatterson
MVP Regular Contributor

Hey all,

Just got off the phone with ESRI support, the comment made in the idea post, this one here:

CodyPatterson_0-1742561314956.png

Was made in error and is incorrect, apparently the release mentioned was for ArcGIS Online, and that as of Enterprise 11.4, which was many releases after the 2022-2023 Enterprise versions, this is still not implemented and is currently still in development. If I can find a work-around, I will post it here.

Cody

View solution in original post

1 Reply
CodyPatterson
MVP Regular Contributor

Hey all,

Just got off the phone with ESRI support, the comment made in the idea post, this one here:

CodyPatterson_0-1742561314956.png

Was made in error and is incorrect, apparently the release mentioned was for ArcGIS Online, and that as of Enterprise 11.4, which was many releases after the 2022-2023 Enterprise versions, this is still not implemented and is currently still in development. If I can find a work-around, I will post it here.

Cody