<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Utility Network - Thoughts... in Water Utilities Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/water-utilities-questions/utility-network-thoughts/m-p/309605#M637</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Our organization is looking at moving to the Utility Network data model, but we have heard mixed reviews.&amp;nbsp; Anyone using the model currently have any insight (good or bad)?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Feb 2020 16:50:15 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>JenniferCrawford</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2020-02-03T16:50:15Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Utility Network - Thoughts...</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/water-utilities-questions/utility-network-thoughts/m-p/309605#M637</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Our organization is looking at moving to the Utility Network data model, but we have heard mixed reviews.&amp;nbsp; Anyone using the model currently have any insight (good or bad)?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Feb 2020 16:50:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/water-utilities-questions/utility-network-thoughts/m-p/309605#M637</guid>
      <dc:creator>JenniferCrawford</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-02-03T16:50:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Utility Network - Thoughts...</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/water-utilities-questions/utility-network-thoughts/m-p/309606#M638</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Jennifer, I hope you don't mind me piggybacking my question - Would anyone who switched be willing to share if they used a consultant or ESRI to manage the transition or did you do it all in house?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Feb 2020 17:14:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/water-utilities-questions/utility-network-thoughts/m-p/309606#M638</guid>
      <dc:creator>ThomasYork2</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-02-03T17:14:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Utility Network - Thoughts...</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/water-utilities-questions/utility-network-thoughts/m-p/309607#M639</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;As a consultant who has been involved with the Utility Network model since it's early alpha and beta releases I'll leave my 2 cents.&amp;nbsp; The hardest part of the implementation of water/storm/sewer is&amp;nbsp;going to be working through all the data preparation / cleanup, and for that I'd highly recommend using Esri or a Consultant to help manage that part. If you have a strong data conversion team in house they should be able to handle the conversion, with some guidance from Esri or a Consultant.&amp;nbsp; If you don't have a strong data conversion team in house you will likely need to bring in an outside consultant.&amp;nbsp; If you do end up going the consultant route I recommend you look for consultants who have been Certified as capable of implementing the Utility Network by Esri.&amp;nbsp; If you want to do it all in house then a good place to start would be to take all of the classes and certifications recommended by Esri to get certified.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Feb 2020 21:56:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/water-utilities-questions/utility-network-thoughts/m-p/309607#M639</guid>
      <dc:creator>RobertKrisher</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-02-03T21:56:17Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

