<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Trouble with Census Data in Water Utilities Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/water-utilities-questions/trouble-with-census-data/m-p/561407#M1378</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am doing project calculating displacement due to sea level rise (SLR). I am doing so by using intersecting the SLR polygons with census tracts for each state and then running zonal statistics as table with the intersect shapefile and a Gridded Population raster. However, when I run the zonal stats as table tool, I get higher rates of displacement than is reasonable. For example, one census tract has a total population of ~8,000 but the calculated displacement for that tract is ~12,000. Is there a reason for why I am getting higher rates of displacement than I should be? Or is there a better method I should use? Thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2020 17:32:05 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>RachelSuhs</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2020-06-19T17:32:05Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Trouble with Census Data</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/water-utilities-questions/trouble-with-census-data/m-p/561407#M1378</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am doing project calculating displacement due to sea level rise (SLR). I am doing so by using intersecting the SLR polygons with census tracts for each state and then running zonal statistics as table with the intersect shapefile and a Gridded Population raster. However, when I run the zonal stats as table tool, I get higher rates of displacement than is reasonable. For example, one census tract has a total population of ~8,000 but the calculated displacement for that tract is ~12,000. Is there a reason for why I am getting higher rates of displacement than I should be? Or is there a better method I should use? Thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2020 17:32:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/water-utilities-questions/trouble-with-census-data/m-p/561407#M1378</guid>
      <dc:creator>RachelSuhs</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-06-19T17:32:05Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Trouble with Census Data</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/water-utilities-questions/trouble-with-census-data/m-p/561408#M1379</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM style="background-color: #ffffff; "&gt;Gridded Population raster...&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="background-color: #ffffff;"&gt;I would double check your population data;&amp;nbsp; For the tract that is giving you the problem, how is the 8,000 population derived?&amp;nbsp; The only population&amp;nbsp; data I've ever worked with is in polygon form, so the assumption&amp;nbsp; that the population is smoothly distributed across the polygon has to be made.&amp;nbsp; Does your &lt;EM&gt;gridded population&amp;nbsp; raster&lt;/EM&gt;&amp;nbsp; have cell to cell values that would indicate density variability?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2020 18:23:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/water-utilities-questions/trouble-with-census-data/m-p/561408#M1379</guid>
      <dc:creator>JoeBorgione</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-06-19T18:23:21Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Trouble with Census Data</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/water-utilities-questions/trouble-with-census-data/m-p/561409#M1380</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;The 8,000 population is derived from current census data estimates and is in polygon form. The gridded population raster does have density variability if I am understanding your question right. The gridded population raster can be found here&amp;nbsp;&lt;A class="link-titled" href="https://sedac.ciesin.columbia.edu/data/collection/gpw-v4/sets/browse" title="https://sedac.ciesin.columbia.edu/data/collection/gpw-v4/sets/browse"&gt;Data » Gridded Population of the World (GPW), v4 | SEDAC&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2020 18:34:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/water-utilities-questions/trouble-with-census-data/m-p/561409#M1380</guid>
      <dc:creator>RachelSuhs</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-06-19T18:34:13Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Trouble with Census Data</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/water-utilities-questions/trouble-with-census-data/m-p/561410#M1381</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;The polygon data shows 8,000; can you sum all your grid cells and see what that shows?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2020 18:56:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/water-utilities-questions/trouble-with-census-data/m-p/561410#M1381</guid>
      <dc:creator>JoeBorgione</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-06-19T18:56:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

