<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Streams ending into the sea in Water Resources Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/water-resources-questions/streams-ending-into-the-sea/m-p/111865#M478</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="color: #454545; background-color: #ffffff;"&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Hi all,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="color: #454545; background-color: #ffffff;"&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="color: #454545; background-color: #ffffff;"&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I was wondering if anyone could confirm the validity of my approach.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN style="color: #454545; background-color: #ffffff;"&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="color: #454545; background-color: #ffffff;"&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="color: #454545; background-color: #ffffff;"&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I am running a terrain preprocessing&amp;nbsp;using a raw DEM and a feature class for known streams (that I will burn in through DEM reconditioning).&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="color: #454545; background-color: #ffffff;"&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="color: #454545; background-color: #ffffff;"&gt;My DEM raster has values (approx 0 meters) for locations corresponding to the sea. Most of my streams&amp;nbsp;(in my stream feature class) "exit" the DEM, however&amp;nbsp;several individual streams end up in the sea. I was thinking of converting a sea polygon to raster and removing this from my raw DEM. This way I am making sure all streams will exit the raster (and won’t get refilled after burning). Then I can append “coastal” catchments at the end of the terrain preprocessing&amp;nbsp;which will add missing catchments not associated to modeled streams.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="color: #454545; background-color: #ffffff;"&gt; This makes more sense to me than treating the sea as a “sink" (and basically creating a sink structure for the sea). Does anyone have any comments regarding this approach and does it sound reasonable?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="color: #454545; background-color: #ffffff;"&gt;Thanks so much for the help.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="color: #454545; background-color: #ffffff;"&gt;Alex.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN class="" style="color: #454545; background-color: #ffffff; border: 0px; font-size: 22.6667px;"&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2019 08:22:30 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>AlexanderVentura</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-02-26T08:22:30Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Streams ending into the sea</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/water-resources-questions/streams-ending-into-the-sea/m-p/111865#M478</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="color: #454545; background-color: #ffffff;"&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Hi all,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="color: #454545; background-color: #ffffff;"&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="color: #454545; background-color: #ffffff;"&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I was wondering if anyone could confirm the validity of my approach.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN style="color: #454545; background-color: #ffffff;"&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="color: #454545; background-color: #ffffff;"&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="color: #454545; background-color: #ffffff;"&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I am running a terrain preprocessing&amp;nbsp;using a raw DEM and a feature class for known streams (that I will burn in through DEM reconditioning).&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="color: #454545; background-color: #ffffff;"&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="color: #454545; background-color: #ffffff;"&gt;My DEM raster has values (approx 0 meters) for locations corresponding to the sea. Most of my streams&amp;nbsp;(in my stream feature class) "exit" the DEM, however&amp;nbsp;several individual streams end up in the sea. I was thinking of converting a sea polygon to raster and removing this from my raw DEM. This way I am making sure all streams will exit the raster (and won’t get refilled after burning). Then I can append “coastal” catchments at the end of the terrain preprocessing&amp;nbsp;which will add missing catchments not associated to modeled streams.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="color: #454545; background-color: #ffffff;"&gt; This makes more sense to me than treating the sea as a “sink" (and basically creating a sink structure for the sea). Does anyone have any comments regarding this approach and does it sound reasonable?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="color: #454545; background-color: #ffffff;"&gt;Thanks so much for the help.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="color: #454545; background-color: #ffffff;"&gt;Alex.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN class="" style="color: #454545; background-color: #ffffff; border: 0px; font-size: 22.6667px;"&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2019 08:22:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/water-resources-questions/streams-ending-into-the-sea/m-p/111865#M478</guid>
      <dc:creator>AlexanderVentura</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-02-26T08:22:30Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Streams ending into the sea</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/water-resources-questions/streams-ending-into-the-sea/m-p/111866#M479</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;burn the sea as well so that its elevation is the same as the burn depth... then it should end up back at zero.&amp;nbsp; Otherwise your approach seems reasonable&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2019 10:50:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/water-resources-questions/streams-ending-into-the-sea/m-p/111866#M479</guid>
      <dc:creator>DanPatterson_Retired</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-02-26T10:50:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Streams ending into the sea</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/water-resources-questions/streams-ending-into-the-sea/m-p/111867#M480</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Dan,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;thanks but how do I “burn” the sea? Should I use the “Create Sink Structures”? But this way the streams end up into a sink no? So essentially I would be treating the sea as a sink&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;and would need to add a sink point at the end of each stream so that it doesn’t get refilled. Or am I missing something?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2019 10:59:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/water-resources-questions/streams-ending-into-the-sea/m-p/111867#M480</guid>
      <dc:creator>AlexanderVentura</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-02-26T10:59:54Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Streams ending into the sea</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/water-resources-questions/streams-ending-into-the-sea/m-p/111868#M481</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I can only think of the spatial analysis to make the sea a sink using the Con statement&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Con("your_dem" == 0, -2, "your_dem")&amp;nbsp; # assuming a burn depth of 2 meters.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Arc Hydro must do things differently, I usually burn after sinks are filled to provide a preferential path for streams generate.&amp;nbsp; so go with your approach and test it, if my suggestion confuses the issue&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2019 11:11:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/water-resources-questions/streams-ending-into-the-sea/m-p/111868#M481</guid>
      <dc:creator>DanPatterson_Retired</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-02-26T11:11:06Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

