<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Adjoint Catchment Processing issue in Water Resources Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/water-resources-questions/adjoint-catchment-processing-issue/m-p/99622#M408</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;This is the procedure... &lt;A href="http://desktop.arcgis.com/en/arcmap/latest/tools/spatial-analyst-toolbox/creating-a-depressionless-dem.htm" title="http://desktop.arcgis.com/en/arcmap/latest/tools/spatial-analyst-toolbox/creating-a-depressionless-dem.htm"&gt;Creating a depressionless DEM—Help | ArcGIS for Desktop&lt;/A&gt; I am sure you are familiar with it.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Even if you are using archydro, at some point you can only summarize what the literature says, what tools say they do and interpret your results accordingly.&amp;nbsp; Identifying the procedure and put it in the context of the published literature is more than adequate for a thesis.&amp;nbsp; Your results are really not relevant... they are 'correct' in terms of the limitations of the methodology and the data your used.&amp;nbsp; As long as you can demonstrate that ... and no one's lives are lost as a result of your work ... then no one can fault you.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Good luck... remember... "the only good thesis, is a done thesis"&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sat, 23 Apr 2016 16:15:43 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>DanPatterson_Retired</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2016-04-23T16:15:43Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Adjoint Catchment Processing issue</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/water-resources-questions/adjoint-catchment-processing-issue/m-p/99621#M407</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi there!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am trying to see the boundaries of my three rivers' watershed. I am having an issue on adjoint catchment processing. I attached a screen view of my map. I've read some of the posts related. I think I succeed on filling the sinks. But if you can tell me how can I test it I would appriciate it. Catchment grid seems OK this time to me. I rebooted my computer several times and emptied Temp folder. These don't solve the problem.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I've already spent too much time making this analysis. Any suggestions will be appriciated.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Merve&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 23 Apr 2016 13:44:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/water-resources-questions/adjoint-catchment-processing-issue/m-p/99621#M407</guid>
      <dc:creator>MERVEOZEREN</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-04-23T13:44:05Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Adjoint Catchment Processing issue</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/water-resources-questions/adjoint-catchment-processing-issue/m-p/99622#M408</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;This is the procedure... &lt;A href="http://desktop.arcgis.com/en/arcmap/latest/tools/spatial-analyst-toolbox/creating-a-depressionless-dem.htm" title="http://desktop.arcgis.com/en/arcmap/latest/tools/spatial-analyst-toolbox/creating-a-depressionless-dem.htm"&gt;Creating a depressionless DEM—Help | ArcGIS for Desktop&lt;/A&gt; I am sure you are familiar with it.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Even if you are using archydro, at some point you can only summarize what the literature says, what tools say they do and interpret your results accordingly.&amp;nbsp; Identifying the procedure and put it in the context of the published literature is more than adequate for a thesis.&amp;nbsp; Your results are really not relevant... they are 'correct' in terms of the limitations of the methodology and the data your used.&amp;nbsp; As long as you can demonstrate that ... and no one's lives are lost as a result of your work ... then no one can fault you.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Good luck... remember... "the only good thesis, is a done thesis"&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 23 Apr 2016 16:15:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/water-resources-questions/adjoint-catchment-processing-issue/m-p/99622#M408</guid>
      <dc:creator>DanPatterson_Retired</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-04-23T16:15:43Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Adjoint Catchment Processing issue</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/water-resources-questions/adjoint-catchment-processing-issue/m-p/99623#M409</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Mr. Patterson,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Your students are really lucky to have you. Thank you for reminding what a thesis should means to me. I will keep that in my mind.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I will also have a deeper look at the link you sent.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you again.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;m.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 23 Apr 2016 16:30:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/water-resources-questions/adjoint-catchment-processing-issue/m-p/99623#M409</guid>
      <dc:creator>MERVEOZEREN</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-04-23T16:30:26Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

