<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic FEFLOW model to ArcGIS - Points to raster? (without gaps) in Water Resources Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/water-resources-questions/feflow-model-to-arcgis-points-to-raster-without/m-p/761377#M3897</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello world!&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I'm facing a pretty frustrating task atm.&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;For the straight-forward guys:&amp;nbsp;my questions are in the very end. &lt;BR /&gt;For anyone interested in further details, here some screenshots.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Here the result of a hydrological simulation using the software FEFLOW (finite-element):&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;IMG alt="Result in Feflow" class="jive-emoji image-1 jive-image" height="263" src="https://community.esri.com/legacyfs/online/456896_1252days.JPG" width="561" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;What it shows is the temperature distribution&amp;nbsp;in groundwater-offstream of geothermal injection wells.&lt;BR /&gt;So far so good, result is not only valid, but looks real good.ull&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The problem now is to export that result as raster for further use in ArcGIS, which is not possible using that software.&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;It allows me only to export the values on the node-points I used to create the distribution.&lt;BR /&gt;So, it is possible to export as Shapefile, but when importing it to Arcgis, it of course looks like that:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;IMG alt="Simulation result loaded to ArcGIS" class="jive-emoji image-2 jive-image" height="389" src="https://community.esri.com/legacyfs/online/456897_datapoints.JPG" width="569" /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;You might now already know what my problem is....&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;I now need to find a way to convert it into a raster.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Interpolation (Kriging, IDW etc.) leads to horrible results, I've tried that already. It also seems riddiculous to again krig the result of a precice FE-model....&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;My way was the tool "Points to raster".&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;I'm feeling that I'm on the right way, but am still facing a problem, that you'll see in the following screenshot:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;IMG alt="After &amp;quot;Point to raster&amp;quot;-Operation" class="image-3 jive-emoji jive-image" height="393" src="https://community.esri.com/legacyfs/online/456898_arcgis_pointtoraster.JPG" width="577" /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;You see, this is no comparison to the first screenshot (FEFLOW-model)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;My questions to you now:&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;1 Is there a way to further edit that raster above, to get&amp;nbsp;full coverage (no gaps) with some kind of nearest-neighbor operation?&lt;BR /&gt;2 Is there another way of working with that data in ArcGIS, to create a raster as good as the simulation-result in FEFLOW?&lt;BR /&gt;3 What would you do (Feflow allows exporting in .xlsx, .accdb, .dbf, .dxf, .mdb, .pnt, .trp .dat and .shp) but none of those would give me a better feeling...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 13 Aug 2019 07:45:12 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>OliverLeimer1</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-08-13T07:45:12Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>FEFLOW model to ArcGIS - Points to raster? (without gaps)</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/water-resources-questions/feflow-model-to-arcgis-points-to-raster-without/m-p/761377#M3897</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello world!&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I'm facing a pretty frustrating task atm.&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;For the straight-forward guys:&amp;nbsp;my questions are in the very end. &lt;BR /&gt;For anyone interested in further details, here some screenshots.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Here the result of a hydrological simulation using the software FEFLOW (finite-element):&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;IMG alt="Result in Feflow" class="jive-emoji image-1 jive-image" height="263" src="https://community.esri.com/legacyfs/online/456896_1252days.JPG" width="561" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;What it shows is the temperature distribution&amp;nbsp;in groundwater-offstream of geothermal injection wells.&lt;BR /&gt;So far so good, result is not only valid, but looks real good.ull&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The problem now is to export that result as raster for further use in ArcGIS, which is not possible using that software.&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;It allows me only to export the values on the node-points I used to create the distribution.&lt;BR /&gt;So, it is possible to export as Shapefile, but when importing it to Arcgis, it of course looks like that:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;IMG alt="Simulation result loaded to ArcGIS" class="jive-emoji image-2 jive-image" height="389" src="https://community.esri.com/legacyfs/online/456897_datapoints.JPG" width="569" /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;You might now already know what my problem is....&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;I now need to find a way to convert it into a raster.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Interpolation (Kriging, IDW etc.) leads to horrible results, I've tried that already. It also seems riddiculous to again krig the result of a precice FE-model....&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;My way was the tool "Points to raster".&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;I'm feeling that I'm on the right way, but am still facing a problem, that you'll see in the following screenshot:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;IMG alt="After &amp;quot;Point to raster&amp;quot;-Operation" class="image-3 jive-emoji jive-image" height="393" src="https://community.esri.com/legacyfs/online/456898_arcgis_pointtoraster.JPG" width="577" /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;You see, this is no comparison to the first screenshot (FEFLOW-model)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;My questions to you now:&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;1 Is there a way to further edit that raster above, to get&amp;nbsp;full coverage (no gaps) with some kind of nearest-neighbor operation?&lt;BR /&gt;2 Is there another way of working with that data in ArcGIS, to create a raster as good as the simulation-result in FEFLOW?&lt;BR /&gt;3 What would you do (Feflow allows exporting in .xlsx, .accdb, .dbf, .dxf, .mdb, .pnt, .trp .dat and .shp) but none of those would give me a better feeling...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Aug 2019 07:45:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/water-resources-questions/feflow-model-to-arcgis-points-to-raster-without/m-p/761377#M3897</guid>
      <dc:creator>OliverLeimer1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-08-13T07:45:12Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: FEFLOW model to ArcGIS - Points to raster? (without gaps)</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/water-resources-questions/feflow-model-to-arcgis-points-to-raster-without/m-p/761378#M3898</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Please post an image of IDW using the same classification and colors you have in the finite-element output.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;What happens if you make the cell size smaller?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;-Steve&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Aug 2019 10:23:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/water-resources-questions/feflow-model-to-arcgis-points-to-raster-without/m-p/761378#M3898</guid>
      <dc:creator>SteveLynch</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-08-13T10:23:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: FEFLOW model to ArcGIS - Points to raster? (without gaps)</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/water-resources-questions/feflow-model-to-arcgis-points-to-raster-without/m-p/761379#M3899</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Steve,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;thanks for your input.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I created a workaround&lt;BR /&gt;First i refined the mesh-resulution in FEFLOW a bit and made a second calculation&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Then I imported the FEFLOW-Results als Shapefile (see original post above) and again did the Points-to-raster Operation, leading to a similar result as in my first post (I set the cellsize to 5 m):&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;IMG alt="" class="image-1 jive-image" height="373" src="https://community.esri.com/legacyfs/online/457012_3_RasterVorFilter.JPG" width="518" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;But what I then did was applying a low-pass filter to reduce the "noise". Not just one to be honest, 6 in a row.&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;the result was this:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;IMG alt="After low pass-Filter" class="image-2 jive-image" height="376" src="https://community.esri.com/legacyfs/online/457023_Ergebnis_Filter.JPG" width="527" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This is as close as it gets to the FEFLOW-Plot.&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Just&amp;nbsp;for comparison, this is the IDW-Result:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;IMG alt="IDW" class="image-3 jive-image" height="367" src="https://community.esri.com/legacyfs/online/457024_IDW.JPG" width="526" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Not quite as nice, right? &lt;IMG src="https://community.esri.com/legacyfs/online/emoticons/grin.png" /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Cheers&lt;BR /&gt;Oliver&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Aug 2019 15:51:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/water-resources-questions/feflow-model-to-arcgis-points-to-raster-without/m-p/761379#M3899</guid>
      <dc:creator>OliverLeimer1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-08-14T15:51:56Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: FEFLOW model to ArcGIS - Points to raster? (without gaps)</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/water-resources-questions/feflow-model-to-arcgis-points-to-raster-without/m-p/761380#M3900</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Oliver&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You are right, I would change the search neighborhood of idw to only use only a few neighbors.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;-Steve&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Aug 2019 16:54:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/water-resources-questions/feflow-model-to-arcgis-points-to-raster-without/m-p/761380#M3900</guid>
      <dc:creator>SteveLynch</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-08-14T16:54:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

