<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Arc Hydro-Depression Evaluation Trouble in Water Resources Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/water-resources-questions/arc-hydro-depression-evaluation-trouble/m-p/539519#M2833</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Hi,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I trying to delineate subwatersheds using Arc Hydro. I'm using a DEM derived from LIDAR. So far, I've converted the DEM to an integer DEM&amp;nbsp; and run the sink evaluation. The size of the prefilled DEM that I'm trying to run the depression evaluation on is 8.86 GB. My problem is when I run the depression evaluation, it runs for a while (over 8 hrs) then gives me the message "Build VAT might have failed make sure raster target location is not GDB and path does not contain space." Does this simply just mean I have to change the path of where it stores the depression data? Would I do this under "Set target locations for HydroConfig, Layers?" I looked back at some other depression evaluations and their all located in the geodatabase in layers so I'm not sure what the issue is. Is the DEM too big?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Any input would be appreciated.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Thanks.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jun 2010 12:52:50 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>angeldybas</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2010-06-11T12:52:50Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Arc Hydro-Depression Evaluation Trouble</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/water-resources-questions/arc-hydro-depression-evaluation-trouble/m-p/539519#M2833</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Hi,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I trying to delineate subwatersheds using Arc Hydro. I'm using a DEM derived from LIDAR. So far, I've converted the DEM to an integer DEM&amp;nbsp; and run the sink evaluation. The size of the prefilled DEM that I'm trying to run the depression evaluation on is 8.86 GB. My problem is when I run the depression evaluation, it runs for a while (over 8 hrs) then gives me the message "Build VAT might have failed make sure raster target location is not GDB and path does not contain space." Does this simply just mean I have to change the path of where it stores the depression data? Would I do this under "Set target locations for HydroConfig, Layers?" I looked back at some other depression evaluations and their all located in the geodatabase in layers so I'm not sure what the issue is. Is the DEM too big?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Any input would be appreciated.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Thanks.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jun 2010 12:52:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/water-resources-questions/arc-hydro-depression-evaluation-trouble/m-p/539519#M2833</guid>
      <dc:creator>angeldybas</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-06-11T12:52:50Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Arc Hydro-Depression Evaluation Trouble</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/water-resources-questions/arc-hydro-depression-evaluation-trouble/m-p/539520#M2834</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I can't place the source right now, but I've read that ArcHydro has trouble processing high-resolution rasters. I had success resampling our 3.2ft-lidar-derived DEM (~3+ gb) to 10-ft resolution (300+ MB). I burned in a high-resolution stream network after running the dem evaluation &amp;amp; correction steps, and have been able to successfully set up a drainage area tool for a county-level study area. &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;If you don't necessarily need the higher resolution, that might be something to try?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Dec 2010 12:21:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/water-resources-questions/arc-hydro-depression-evaluation-trouble/m-p/539520#M2834</guid>
      <dc:creator>CatherineTulley</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-12-28T12:21:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Arc Hydro-Depression Evaluation Trouble</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/water-resources-questions/arc-hydro-depression-evaluation-trouble/m-p/539521#M2835</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Angel;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; If I am not mistaken, the maximum file size that the grid module can handle is 2GB.&amp;nbsp; However, on the practical side is probably half that size.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Jan 2011 12:51:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/water-resources-questions/arc-hydro-depression-evaluation-trouble/m-p/539521#M2835</guid>
      <dc:creator>JeffLee</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-01-06T12:51:11Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Arc Hydro-Depression Evaluation Trouble</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/water-resources-questions/arc-hydro-depression-evaluation-trouble/m-p/539522#M2836</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I am having the same problem, but I know for sure that it is not the size of the DEM because mine is only 46 MB.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Miguel&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 15 Jan 2011 00:10:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/water-resources-questions/arc-hydro-depression-evaluation-trouble/m-p/539522#M2836</guid>
      <dc:creator>MiguelGuerrero</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-01-15T00:10:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Arc Hydro-Depression Evaluation Trouble</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/water-resources-questions/arc-hydro-depression-evaluation-trouble/m-p/539523#M2837</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Try converting your raster to 32 bit floating point using the copy raster tool and then rerun.&amp;nbsp; When depression evaluation encounters an integer grid it has to build VAT files and unless you change the VAT limits in the "secret esri settings" it will choke; floating point doesn't require the VATs.&amp;nbsp; I encountered the same problem using a 5m LIDAR derived DEM for a HUC8 watershed and this was my work around.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 18:18:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/water-resources-questions/arc-hydro-depression-evaluation-trouble/m-p/539523#M2837</guid>
      <dc:creator>JoshuaWolf</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-02-08T18:18:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

