<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic HEC GeoHMS Terrain Processing - NHD Flowline vs USGS Elevation Data Quality in Water Resources Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/water-resources-questions/hec-geohms-terrain-processing-nhd-flowline-vs-usgs/m-p/513801#M2635</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Hi, &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I'm trying to decide if I should apply the burn-in process as part of terrain preprocessing per the HEC GeoHMS user manual. I've read that when deciding to apply the burning-in process implies that flowline data are more reiliable than the DEM data. &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;So my question is, how should I go about determining if my NHD flowline data are 'better' than my USGS elevation data? What would be some key determining factors here? &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;A second and related question would be: what is an acceptable discrepancy between streams found using elevation data (w/ and w/out burning-in the flowline data) and actual locations? &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Thanks in advance for any thoughts on this!&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sun, 07 Nov 2010 00:24:48 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>MichaelBrady</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2010-11-07T00:24:48Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>HEC GeoHMS Terrain Processing - NHD Flowline vs USGS Elevation Data Quality</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/water-resources-questions/hec-geohms-terrain-processing-nhd-flowline-vs-usgs/m-p/513801#M2635</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Hi, &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I'm trying to decide if I should apply the burn-in process as part of terrain preprocessing per the HEC GeoHMS user manual. I've read that when deciding to apply the burning-in process implies that flowline data are more reiliable than the DEM data. &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;So my question is, how should I go about determining if my NHD flowline data are 'better' than my USGS elevation data? What would be some key determining factors here? &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;A second and related question would be: what is an acceptable discrepancy between streams found using elevation data (w/ and w/out burning-in the flowline data) and actual locations? &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Thanks in advance for any thoughts on this!&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 07 Nov 2010 00:24:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/water-resources-questions/hec-geohms-terrain-processing-nhd-flowline-vs-usgs/m-p/513801#M2635</guid>
      <dc:creator>MichaelBrady</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-11-07T00:24:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

