<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: ArcGIS Schematics - Preventing overlapping links and consistent layout? in Telecommunications Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/telecommunications-questions/arcgis-schematics-preventing-overlapping-links-and/m-p/308576#M187</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Looks like you need to play with the order of the tasks a bit. &amp;nbsp;Separate overlapping links would solve your 1a/b issues. &amp;nbsp;However, immediately after you are running that algo, you then run square links which then perfectly squares things again causing the overlap. &amp;nbsp;So just flipping 4 and 5 should clarify the overlaps.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;For items 2 and 3, you can manually adjust afterwards. &amp;nbsp;The algorithms will normally only get you 80 to 90 percent of the way, then manual white space management is needed for the final 10 to 20 percent. &amp;nbsp;A combination of algorithms that works perfectly for 1 sample area of data may not work well for the next sample area. &amp;nbsp;White space management is tricky. &amp;nbsp;The only way you would get 100% is to write a custom algorithm that does everything for you and rechecks several times to make sure it doesn't violate the desired results.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2017 15:52:13 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>RickAnderson</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2017-01-09T15:52:13Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>ArcGIS Schematics - Preventing overlapping links and consistent layout?</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/telecommunications-questions/arcgis-schematics-preventing-overlapping-links-and/m-p/308575#M186</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm trying to recreate some network diagrams on a consistent basis based on our geometric network data.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The layout algorithms I'm selecting are getting me close but I can't seem to fine tune the layout task to generate a consistent diagram with the desired layout.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This is the approximate style I'm looking to recreate. The important part is the roughly even distribution of the links / branches.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;IMG alt="ExcelDrawing" class="image-1 jive-image j-img-original" src="https://community.esri.com/legacyfs/online/286800_ExcelDrawing.png" style="width: 620px; height: 249px;" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This is roughly what I have going (some of the time) when using the Schematic Editor.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;IMG alt="CableNotes" class="image-2 jive-image j-img-original" src="https://community.esri.com/legacyfs/online/286801_CableNotes.png" style="width: 620px; height: 279px;" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1A / 1B: These are links that overlap that should not.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2: This is a link that need not extend to the right at all. It would great if it was just a straight link downwards.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;3: This branch is an example of where better placement would be on the other side of the main line.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I used a Composite algorithm of the following tasks:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1 - Orthogonal&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2 - Relative - Main Line (using a line attribute)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;3 - Geo - Rotate Nodes Along Links&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;4 - Separate Overlapping Links&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;5 - Square Links&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;6 - Bypass Nodes&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Anyone have a clue as how these tweaks can be achieved?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2016 00:45:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/telecommunications-questions/arcgis-schematics-preventing-overlapping-links-and/m-p/308575#M186</guid>
      <dc:creator>EokNgo</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-12-20T00:45:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ArcGIS Schematics - Preventing overlapping links and consistent layout?</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/telecommunications-questions/arcgis-schematics-preventing-overlapping-links-and/m-p/308576#M187</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Looks like you need to play with the order of the tasks a bit. &amp;nbsp;Separate overlapping links would solve your 1a/b issues. &amp;nbsp;However, immediately after you are running that algo, you then run square links which then perfectly squares things again causing the overlap. &amp;nbsp;So just flipping 4 and 5 should clarify the overlaps.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;For items 2 and 3, you can manually adjust afterwards. &amp;nbsp;The algorithms will normally only get you 80 to 90 percent of the way, then manual white space management is needed for the final 10 to 20 percent. &amp;nbsp;A combination of algorithms that works perfectly for 1 sample area of data may not work well for the next sample area. &amp;nbsp;White space management is tricky. &amp;nbsp;The only way you would get 100% is to write a custom algorithm that does everything for you and rechecks several times to make sure it doesn't violate the desired results.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2017 15:52:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/telecommunications-questions/arcgis-schematics-preventing-overlapping-links-and/m-p/308576#M187</guid>
      <dc:creator>RickAnderson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-01-09T15:52:13Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ArcGIS Schematics - Preventing overlapping links and consistent layout?</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/telecommunications-questions/arcgis-schematics-preventing-overlapping-links-and/m-p/308577#M188</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Actually, instead of running the Separate Overlapping Links algorithm, you really should be running the Geo-Partial Overlapping Links algorithm. &amp;nbsp;Separate only works on lines that are completely overlapping, i.e. they have the same end points. &amp;nbsp;The partial overlapping algo just looks for any overlapping segment.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="http://resources.arcgis.com/en/help/main/10.2/index.html#/Geo_Partial_Overlapping_Links_layout_algorithm_properties/004z0000003r000000/"&gt;POLA algorithm&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2017 16:59:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/telecommunications-questions/arcgis-schematics-preventing-overlapping-links-and/m-p/308577#M188</guid>
      <dc:creator>RickAnderson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-01-09T16:59:53Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

