<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Municipal Agreement Registry — App that is primarily non-spatial, with secondary map component, no-code in State &amp; Local Government Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/state-local-government-questions/municipal-agreement-registry-app-that-is-primarily/m-p/1699330#M5143</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Summary:&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;What are the options for building a &lt;STRONG&gt;Municipal Agreement Registry&lt;/STRONG&gt;&amp;nbsp;using the ArcGIS platform? (Enterprise/Portal or AGOL)&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;The system is meant to track and manage legal agreements. It would primarily be a &lt;STRONG&gt;non-spatial system with forms, lists, &amp;amp; hyperlinks&lt;/STRONG&gt;, and it would have a secondary map component for spatial visualization.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Details:&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;OL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;A list of legal agreements that the City, businesses, or residents have signed. New list entries are to be submitted using a form. And the table would have hyperlinks to legal documents on a local network drive.&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Agreement types:&lt;OL class="lia-list-style-type-lower-alpha"&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;U&gt;Civil Development&lt;/U&gt; (subdivision, site plan, condo)&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;U&gt;Business Development&lt;/U&gt; (sponsorship, grant, advertising, loan)&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;U&gt;Land Information&lt;/U&gt; (easement, parcel, land transfer, encroachment, rental, licensing, shared road)&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;U&gt;Facilities and Maintenance&lt;/U&gt; (access, construction)&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;U&gt;Legal&lt;/U&gt; (contract, financial, purchase/sale, funding, data sharing, non-disclosure, union&lt;U&gt;)&lt;/U&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/OL&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;A list of 10,000 existing agreements to be loaded, growing to a maximum of 15,000 records. And there are additional related tables: one-to-many relationship.&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;A web map to visualize where the agreements are located, and symbolize the agreements by type. Unfortunately, not all records will have a spatial component. Best guess is we will do some combination of the following to map the records that do have spatial information:&lt;OL class="lia-list-style-type-lower-alpha"&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Geocode tabular addresses&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Join a City_Property_ID field to a City_Property polygon layer&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Join a Subdivision_Number to a Subdivision polygon layer&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/OL&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Looking to build a &lt;STRONG&gt;no-code or low-code&lt;/STRONG&gt; solution that has &lt;STRONG&gt;strong form and list functionality&lt;/STRONG&gt;. We've ruled out Microsoft Power Apps and SharePoint Lists because they don't support this many records, and they don't handle related 1:M tables well.&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/OL&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;What ArcGIS product do you recommend for a primarily non-spatial system like this?&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2026 19:18:21 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Bud</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2026-04-30T19:18:21Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Municipal Agreement Registry — App that is primarily non-spatial, with secondary map component, no-code</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/state-local-government-questions/municipal-agreement-registry-app-that-is-primarily/m-p/1699330#M5143</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Summary:&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;What are the options for building a &lt;STRONG&gt;Municipal Agreement Registry&lt;/STRONG&gt;&amp;nbsp;using the ArcGIS platform? (Enterprise/Portal or AGOL)&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;The system is meant to track and manage legal agreements. It would primarily be a &lt;STRONG&gt;non-spatial system with forms, lists, &amp;amp; hyperlinks&lt;/STRONG&gt;, and it would have a secondary map component for spatial visualization.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Details:&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;OL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;A list of legal agreements that the City, businesses, or residents have signed. New list entries are to be submitted using a form. And the table would have hyperlinks to legal documents on a local network drive.&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Agreement types:&lt;OL class="lia-list-style-type-lower-alpha"&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;U&gt;Civil Development&lt;/U&gt; (subdivision, site plan, condo)&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;U&gt;Business Development&lt;/U&gt; (sponsorship, grant, advertising, loan)&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;U&gt;Land Information&lt;/U&gt; (easement, parcel, land transfer, encroachment, rental, licensing, shared road)&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;U&gt;Facilities and Maintenance&lt;/U&gt; (access, construction)&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;U&gt;Legal&lt;/U&gt; (contract, financial, purchase/sale, funding, data sharing, non-disclosure, union&lt;U&gt;)&lt;/U&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/OL&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;A list of 10,000 existing agreements to be loaded, growing to a maximum of 15,000 records. And there are additional related tables: one-to-many relationship.&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;A web map to visualize where the agreements are located, and symbolize the agreements by type. Unfortunately, not all records will have a spatial component. Best guess is we will do some combination of the following to map the records that do have spatial information:&lt;OL class="lia-list-style-type-lower-alpha"&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Geocode tabular addresses&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Join a City_Property_ID field to a City_Property polygon layer&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Join a Subdivision_Number to a Subdivision polygon layer&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/OL&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Looking to build a &lt;STRONG&gt;no-code or low-code&lt;/STRONG&gt; solution that has &lt;STRONG&gt;strong form and list functionality&lt;/STRONG&gt;. We've ruled out Microsoft Power Apps and SharePoint Lists because they don't support this many records, and they don't handle related 1:M tables well.&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/OL&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;What ArcGIS product do you recommend for a primarily non-spatial system like this?&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2026 19:18:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/state-local-government-questions/municipal-agreement-registry-app-that-is-primarily/m-p/1699330#M5143</guid>
      <dc:creator>Bud</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-04-30T19:18:21Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Municipal Agreement Registry — App that is primarily non-spatial, with secondary map component, no-code</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/state-local-government-questions/municipal-agreement-registry-app-that-is-primarily/m-p/1699342#M5144</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;[removed]&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2026 19:19:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/state-local-government-questions/municipal-agreement-registry-app-that-is-primarily/m-p/1699342#M5144</guid>
      <dc:creator>Bud</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-04-30T19:19:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

