<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Zoning Data with more than 1 variance in State &amp; Local Government Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/state-local-government-questions/zoning-data-with-more-than-1-variance/m-p/1114686#M4963</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi all,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am in the process of rebuilding our Zoning map, with the intent of it being web facing, so people can click on a parcel and get the assigned Zoning designation and information.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Our Zoning Code has a few zones that have more than one variance/regulation assigned to them.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;For instance, R2, has multiple regulations all with different lot widths and depths and set back requirements.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;My question is this:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;How best to incorporate the data from those multiple regulation Zoning designations into the attribute table, so that all 4 options are shown in the Identify window, or a pop up in the online web map.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have attached the spreadsheet I am using to populate the new Zoning layer.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I want to avoid having to put See Ordinance in the various set back and dimension columns as this is the way the old version works.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I do have a feeling, some Planning office somewhere has done something similar to what I am thinking of doing, so the question is posed to the brain trust&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks in advance for your time and attention&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Rick&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Nov 2021 21:57:11 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Anonymous User</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2021-11-05T21:57:11Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Zoning Data with more than 1 variance</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/state-local-government-questions/zoning-data-with-more-than-1-variance/m-p/1114686#M4963</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi all,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am in the process of rebuilding our Zoning map, with the intent of it being web facing, so people can click on a parcel and get the assigned Zoning designation and information.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Our Zoning Code has a few zones that have more than one variance/regulation assigned to them.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;For instance, R2, has multiple regulations all with different lot widths and depths and set back requirements.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;My question is this:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;How best to incorporate the data from those multiple regulation Zoning designations into the attribute table, so that all 4 options are shown in the Identify window, or a pop up in the online web map.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have attached the spreadsheet I am using to populate the new Zoning layer.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I want to avoid having to put See Ordinance in the various set back and dimension columns as this is the way the old version works.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I do have a feeling, some Planning office somewhere has done something similar to what I am thinking of doing, so the question is posed to the brain trust&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks in advance for your time and attention&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Rick&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Nov 2021 21:57:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/state-local-government-questions/zoning-data-with-more-than-1-variance/m-p/1114686#M4963</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous User</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-11-05T21:57:11Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Zoning Data with more than 1 variance</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/state-local-government-questions/zoning-data-with-more-than-1-variance/m-p/1114689#M4964</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;what about having the&amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN&gt;variance/regulation in a related&amp;nbsp;table?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Nov 2021 22:16:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/state-local-government-questions/zoning-data-with-more-than-1-variance/m-p/1114689#M4964</guid>
      <dc:creator>forestknutsen1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-11-05T22:16:27Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Zoning Data with more than 1 variance</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/state-local-government-questions/zoning-data-with-more-than-1-variance/m-p/1116888#M4965</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I have thought about this, but my question then becomes, will the relationship persist when uploaded to AGOL? Either I haven't found a good explanation on this, or I am not using the right search terms.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Nov 2021 14:56:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/state-local-government-questions/zoning-data-with-more-than-1-variance/m-p/1116888#M4965</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous User</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-11-15T14:56:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Zoning Data with more than 1 variance</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/state-local-government-questions/zoning-data-with-more-than-1-variance/m-p/1117968#M4966</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;We ended up doing that, creating a spreadsheet that had all the values, and uploaded that document to AGOL, and then did a join to the Zoning data.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Nov 2021 22:57:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/state-local-government-questions/zoning-data-with-more-than-1-variance/m-p/1117968#M4966</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous User</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-11-17T22:57:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

