<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: FacilitySitePoints and published layers in State &amp; Local Government Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/state-local-government-questions/facilitysitepoints-and-published-layers/m-p/595173#M3882</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Have you looked at the Building layer in the FacilitiesStreets dataset? It's a poly layer, but I see no reason you couldn't use the schema and have a point layer instead. The description of that layer indicates that it's a subset of another layer only representing buildings managed by a local government or other land holder.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2015 18:19:29 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>SallieVaughn</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2015-09-24T18:19:29Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>FacilitySitePoints and published layers</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/state-local-government-questions/facilitysitepoints-and-published-layers/m-p/595172#M3881</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Under the FacilitySitePoints there is a subtype for Government and Military (830). Under the ReferenceData dataset I do not see an individual point layer for GovernmentBuilding but it seems to me that there should be. Am I overlooking Government Building somewhere else? Are there pros or cons to having this point layer? I've copied the PublicWork point layer into the ReferenceData dataset and renamed it GovernmentBuilding. Does anyone have a better recommendation?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2015 16:02:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/state-local-government-questions/facilitysitepoints-and-published-layers/m-p/595172#M3881</guid>
      <dc:creator>GIS-Cambria</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-09-04T16:02:10Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: FacilitySitePoints and published layers</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/state-local-government-questions/facilitysitepoints-and-published-layers/m-p/595173#M3882</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Have you looked at the Building layer in the FacilitiesStreets dataset? It's a poly layer, but I see no reason you couldn't use the schema and have a point layer instead. The description of that layer indicates that it's a subset of another layer only representing buildings managed by a local government or other land holder.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2015 18:19:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/state-local-government-questions/facilitysitepoints-and-published-layers/m-p/595173#M3882</guid>
      <dc:creator>SallieVaughn</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-09-24T18:19:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

