<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic GIS governance model in State &amp; Local Government Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/state-local-government-questions/gis-governance-model/m-p/61339#M371</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have been reviewing other municipalities to see what type of GIS governance model is being used.&amp;nbsp; There are 3 different models with various pro's and con's that are the most common.&amp;nbsp; For simplicity sake, I'm curious as to the approach others are using and won't delve into the specifics of the pros and cons as I see them.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Centralized model, a fully established GIS Department with an Enterprise GIS environment that supports the entire organization and it's customers.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Decentralized model, the organization has multiple departments implementing their own strategies and maintaining data and information for their area of interest with no real single GIS governance.&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Hybrid model, a varying degree of both centralized or decentralized.&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'd like to hear from others as to how their organization is structured.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2018 23:45:41 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>KB1</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2018-11-19T23:45:41Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>GIS governance model</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/state-local-government-questions/gis-governance-model/m-p/61339#M371</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have been reviewing other municipalities to see what type of GIS governance model is being used.&amp;nbsp; There are 3 different models with various pro's and con's that are the most common.&amp;nbsp; For simplicity sake, I'm curious as to the approach others are using and won't delve into the specifics of the pros and cons as I see them.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Centralized model, a fully established GIS Department with an Enterprise GIS environment that supports the entire organization and it's customers.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Decentralized model, the organization has multiple departments implementing their own strategies and maintaining data and information for their area of interest with no real single GIS governance.&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Hybrid model, a varying degree of both centralized or decentralized.&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'd like to hear from others as to how their organization is structured.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2018 23:45:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/state-local-government-questions/gis-governance-model/m-p/61339#M371</guid>
      <dc:creator>KB1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-11-19T23:45:41Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

