<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Road Class Domain: Data Dictionary vs Fire Station Wall Map in State &amp; Local Government Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/state-local-government-questions/road-class-domain-data-dictionary-vs-fire-station/m-p/531502#M3418</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;In loading my data into the LGIM I used the data dictionary to help me determine the Road Classes (converting from MTFCC, CFCC and ODOT FCC). In the dictionary it seems that the LGIM&amp;nbsp; 'Collector' designation is lower than both 'Arterials' so that is what I went by. Most of the Local Gov Map templates I have used previously, lump Major and Minor Arterial and Collector all together in similar symbology, so I have not noticed any problems.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;However, in the Fire Station Wall map the symbolism has this order (see Road Centerlines_9K): &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Freeway&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Highway&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Major Arterial&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Collector&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Minor Arterial&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Local, etc.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;And the difference in Collector and Minor Arterial shows up very distinctly in the map. So now I either need to reassign my road segments to different domains or change the Fire Station map symbology.&amp;nbsp; But I want to know which hierarchy is correct since it will be used in future LGIM templates and I only want to correct this once.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;The Local Gov data dictionary has the classes listed in this order: &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Freeway&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Highway&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Major Arterial&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Minor Arterial&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Collector&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Local, etc.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Thanks for any advice,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Leitha&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 May 2013 18:49:05 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>LeithaSackmann</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-05-30T18:49:05Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Road Class Domain: Data Dictionary vs Fire Station Wall Map</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/state-local-government-questions/road-class-domain-data-dictionary-vs-fire-station/m-p/531502#M3418</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;In loading my data into the LGIM I used the data dictionary to help me determine the Road Classes (converting from MTFCC, CFCC and ODOT FCC). In the dictionary it seems that the LGIM&amp;nbsp; 'Collector' designation is lower than both 'Arterials' so that is what I went by. Most of the Local Gov Map templates I have used previously, lump Major and Minor Arterial and Collector all together in similar symbology, so I have not noticed any problems.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;However, in the Fire Station Wall map the symbolism has this order (see Road Centerlines_9K): &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Freeway&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Highway&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Major Arterial&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Collector&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Minor Arterial&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Local, etc.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;And the difference in Collector and Minor Arterial shows up very distinctly in the map. So now I either need to reassign my road segments to different domains or change the Fire Station map symbology.&amp;nbsp; But I want to know which hierarchy is correct since it will be used in future LGIM templates and I only want to correct this once.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;The Local Gov data dictionary has the classes listed in this order: &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Freeway&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Highway&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Major Arterial&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Minor Arterial&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Collector&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Local, etc.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Thanks for any advice,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Leitha&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 May 2013 18:49:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/state-local-government-questions/road-class-domain-data-dictionary-vs-fire-station/m-p/531502#M3418</guid>
      <dc:creator>LeithaSackmann</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-05-30T18:49:05Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Road Class Domain: Data Dictionary vs Fire Station Wall Map</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/state-local-government-questions/road-class-domain-data-dictionary-vs-fire-station/m-p/531503#M3419</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;The order of the road class in the map supports cartographic display and does not imply a hierarchy.&amp;nbsp; Its designed to support the map.&amp;nbsp; The domain in the information model closely matches the functional classification of roads as adapted from the FHWA.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Jun 2013 16:19:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/state-local-government-questions/road-class-domain-data-dictionary-vs-fire-station/m-p/531503#M3419</guid>
      <dc:creator>ScottOppmann</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-06-13T16:19:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Road Class Domain: Data Dictionary vs Fire Station Wall Map</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/state-local-government-questions/road-class-domain-data-dictionary-vs-fire-station/m-p/531504#M3420</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Scott,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Thanks for your response. My road data is heavy in Minor Arterial and Collector designations and the Fire Map's symbology makes a big difference. I don't understand your statement that the map's symbology "does not imply a hierarchy". Clearly the map symbology does in fact imply this:&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;[ATTACH=CONFIG]25248[/ATTACH]&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;But it does not reflect the same hierarchy as is implied in the LG Data Dictionary.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;If I can read between the lines in your response, I think you are saying that the Local Gov Model, following the FHWA, sets "Collectors" lower than both "Major and Minor Arterial". If this is the case, then I will adjust the symbology in the Fire Map to reflect this and will not make changes to my data. &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;If I am correct, perhaps the Fire Map could be updated with symbology that is more reflective of the underlying data structure? Just a heads up for anyone using this map template.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Cheers,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Leitha&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Jun 2013 17:56:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/state-local-government-questions/road-class-domain-data-dictionary-vs-fire-station/m-p/531504#M3420</guid>
      <dc:creator>LeithaSackmann</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-06-13T17:56:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Road Class Domain: Data Dictionary vs Fire Station Wall Map</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/state-local-government-questions/road-class-domain-data-dictionary-vs-fire-station/m-p/531505#M3421</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;This link to FHWA road classification might help you. I too am working to classify our road features for use in the LGIM.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/planning/processes/statewide/related/functional_classification/fc02.cfm"&gt;http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/planning/processes/statewide/related/functional_classification/fc02.cfm&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Has anyone found an ESRI style set for MTFCC codes? That would be helpful.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jul 2013 13:38:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/state-local-government-questions/road-class-domain-data-dictionary-vs-fire-station/m-p/531505#M3421</guid>
      <dc:creator>GIS-Cambria</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-07-12T13:38:23Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

