<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Hand-drawn district boundaries vs GIS? in State &amp; Local Government Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/state-local-government-questions/hand-drawn-district-boundaries-vs-gis/m-p/518660#M3314</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Our district lines also follow the section lines.&amp;nbsp; We leave them on the section line and the parcel's district is determined on&amp;nbsp; a case by case basis, usually by where the house is.&amp;nbsp; If the district boundary bisects smaller lots very often the recorder or auditor will put every other lot in each of the two districts.&amp;nbsp; I will then symbolize the parcels using their tax district.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2015 20:35:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>JeffWard</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2015-05-19T20:35:00Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Hand-drawn district boundaries vs GIS?</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/state-local-government-questions/hand-drawn-district-boundaries-vs-gis/m-p/518659#M3313</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-family: verdana,arial,helvetica; font-size: 10pt;"&gt;Is anyone aware of a precedent being set in regards to District Boundaries (fire, school, library, etc.) changing slightly when put into a GIS-based system? Our old boundaries were strictly based on section lines and text rather than maps and we have some lively discussions regarding the accuracy. IMO, if a parcel pays taxes to a specific district, shouldn't the district line follow the parcel line? Anyone else experiencing this?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2015 20:27:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/state-local-government-questions/hand-drawn-district-boundaries-vs-gis/m-p/518659#M3313</guid>
      <dc:creator>KrisGilbert1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-05-19T20:27:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Hand-drawn district boundaries vs GIS?</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/state-local-government-questions/hand-drawn-district-boundaries-vs-gis/m-p/518660#M3314</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Our district lines also follow the section lines.&amp;nbsp; We leave them on the section line and the parcel's district is determined on&amp;nbsp; a case by case basis, usually by where the house is.&amp;nbsp; If the district boundary bisects smaller lots very often the recorder or auditor will put every other lot in each of the two districts.&amp;nbsp; I will then symbolize the parcels using their tax district.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2015 20:35:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/state-local-government-questions/hand-drawn-district-boundaries-vs-gis/m-p/518660#M3314</guid>
      <dc:creator>JeffWard</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-05-19T20:35:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

