<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Automated Generate Id - Sequence vs. Object Id in State &amp; Local Government Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/state-local-government-questions/automated-generate-id-sequence-vs-object-id/m-p/50431#M329</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I am curious about the pros and cons or reasoning for how the demo Local Gov geodatabase is setup in regard to generating id's for feature classes.&amp;nbsp; I notice that in the demo dataset the generate id for Road Centerline is set to use the dynamic value/generate id combination to populate CENTERLINEID whereas the Facility Site Polygon is set to use dynamic value with an expression that is pulling the object id into the FACILITYID.&amp;nbsp; What should dictate which is the better way or best practice? &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Since I have been migrating to Local Gov Model I have been curious about this especially in an instance where I may have records related to features by an ID.&amp;nbsp; When and if a feature were to be split (because a new road or sewerline is added) and a new ID generated for one of the two features it seems that I would then lose the link between the related record and the full original feature.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Aug 2013 20:28:41 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>JaredCollier</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-08-23T20:28:41Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Automated Generate Id - Sequence vs. Object Id</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/state-local-government-questions/automated-generate-id-sequence-vs-object-id/m-p/50431#M329</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I am curious about the pros and cons or reasoning for how the demo Local Gov geodatabase is setup in regard to generating id's for feature classes.&amp;nbsp; I notice that in the demo dataset the generate id for Road Centerline is set to use the dynamic value/generate id combination to populate CENTERLINEID whereas the Facility Site Polygon is set to use dynamic value with an expression that is pulling the object id into the FACILITYID.&amp;nbsp; What should dictate which is the better way or best practice? &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Since I have been migrating to Local Gov Model I have been curious about this especially in an instance where I may have records related to features by an ID.&amp;nbsp; When and if a feature were to be split (because a new road or sewerline is added) and a new ID generated for one of the two features it seems that I would then lose the link between the related record and the full original feature.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Aug 2013 20:28:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/state-local-government-questions/automated-generate-id-sequence-vs-object-id/m-p/50431#M329</guid>
      <dc:creator>JaredCollier</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-08-23T20:28:41Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

