<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Suggestions on Classification in State &amp; Local Government Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/state-local-government-questions/suggestions-on-classification/m-p/330872#M2050</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;We did some lake bathymetric mapping in grad school. Unless there are specific meaningful breakpoints in the data, I would avoid using anything other than the standard (equal interval) classification behind most bath maps; 0-5, 6-10, 11-15, etc., especially on public maps, the deviation from a "typical" classification will only confuse folks. Although I would make sure to include the limnetic/profundal breakpoint (or zone) in the classification (i.e. 0-5, 6, 7-10, 11-15) with explanation in the legend. &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;My two cents.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;-Bob&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Nov 2013 16:10:50 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>RobertMueller</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-11-06T16:10:50Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Suggestions on Classification</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/state-local-government-questions/suggestions-on-classification/m-p/330871#M2049</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I am working with a interpolated bathymetry layer I created and I was wondering if anyone had any suggestions on which classification type may be best. I am currently using an equal interval scheme but was wondering if anyone thinks jenks or another scheme may be better suited to more accuratley classify the depths. &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Thanks in advance&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Sep 2013 14:29:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/state-local-government-questions/suggestions-on-classification/m-p/330871#M2049</guid>
      <dc:creator>ChrisRobertson1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-09-12T14:29:27Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Suggestions on Classification</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/state-local-government-questions/suggestions-on-classification/m-p/330872#M2050</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;We did some lake bathymetric mapping in grad school. Unless there are specific meaningful breakpoints in the data, I would avoid using anything other than the standard (equal interval) classification behind most bath maps; 0-5, 6-10, 11-15, etc., especially on public maps, the deviation from a "typical" classification will only confuse folks. Although I would make sure to include the limnetic/profundal breakpoint (or zone) in the classification (i.e. 0-5, 6, 7-10, 11-15) with explanation in the legend. &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;My two cents.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;-Bob&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Nov 2013 16:10:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/state-local-government-questions/suggestions-on-classification/m-p/330872#M2050</guid>
      <dc:creator>RobertMueller</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-11-06T16:10:50Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Suggestions on Classification</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/state-local-government-questions/suggestions-on-classification/m-p/330873#M2051</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Good input I figured the equal interval probably made the most sense for the purpose of this map, especially cause thats the way most people are used to seeing values incremented. Thanks a lot.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Nov 2013 12:46:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/state-local-government-questions/suggestions-on-classification/m-p/330873#M2051</guid>
      <dc:creator>ChrisRobertson1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-11-07T12:46:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

