<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Parce Fabric from Step 1 in State &amp; Local Government Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/state-local-government-questions/parce-fabric-from-step-1/m-p/309301#M1873</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Next year we will be implementing Parcel Fabric for Gilpin County, CO. It is a small rural county with no high-precision network and conflicting PLSS data (USGS and BLM do not match). Our current parcels were digitized poorly from Assessor maps and are not worth importing into the fabric. As a result, we will be going section by section through the county and traversing in all the surveys we have records for. &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I have meeting with the county surveyor to decide what were are going to do about the PLSS grid issues. As this is early on, I am looking for input from others of gotchas, things you wish you'd have implemented, etc. Any input is appreciated.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Best,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;-Tom&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2012 02:29:55 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>TomNeer</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-12-11T02:29:55Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Parce Fabric from Step 1</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/state-local-government-questions/parce-fabric-from-step-1/m-p/309301#M1873</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Next year we will be implementing Parcel Fabric for Gilpin County, CO. It is a small rural county with no high-precision network and conflicting PLSS data (USGS and BLM do not match). Our current parcels were digitized poorly from Assessor maps and are not worth importing into the fabric. As a result, we will be going section by section through the county and traversing in all the surveys we have records for. &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I have meeting with the county surveyor to decide what were are going to do about the PLSS grid issues. As this is early on, I am looking for input from others of gotchas, things you wish you'd have implemented, etc. Any input is appreciated.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Best,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;-Tom&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2012 02:29:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/state-local-government-questions/parce-fabric-from-step-1/m-p/309301#M1873</guid>
      <dc:creator>TomNeer</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-12-11T02:29:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Parce Fabric from Step 1</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/state-local-government-questions/parce-fabric-from-step-1/m-p/309302#M1874</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Hello Tom,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Having the resources to capture the parcel from scratch is a privilege not many counties can afford. If you capture them correctly you should end up with very good data. Here are a few recommendations:&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;OL&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Start with a good cadastral framework, in your case good PLSS sections. If you can have a surveyor recapture the section corners any other legal document that ties to the framework will have better accuracy. In some areas you might also need the quarter section corner.&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Capture all the parcels, including the historic parcels, and make sure to enter the legal start date and the legal end date.&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Use the Local Government Information Model �?? this will save you time of data modeling, editing map configuration and you can benefit the automated workflows.&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;LI&gt;If you find out that after you capture everything you can for an area you still have holes �?? use the legacy data with low accuracy (6 or 7) and the first join option.&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Use plans to reference the legal document (subdivision, deed�?�) that created the geometry. You can save it on a shared directory and use the plan source document field to paste the link, making it easier to retrieve later.&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Use accuracies when entering data on plans.&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Capture the lots and the ROWs �?? this will maintain connectivity and will allow you to run adjustment (LSA) in the future.&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/OL&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;There are probably a few more that might be data specific that you will encounter. Start with a pilot area to come up with the best process that includes QA.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt; &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Amir&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2012 19:14:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/state-local-government-questions/parce-fabric-from-step-1/m-p/309302#M1874</guid>
      <dc:creator>AmirBar-Maor</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-12-13T19:14:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Parce Fabric from Step 1</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/state-local-government-questions/parce-fabric-from-step-1/m-p/309303#M1875</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Hi Tom,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I'm in the process of building our parcel fabric from the ground up as well.&amp;nbsp; Our existing layer is crudely digitized and in some cases hundreds of feet off.&amp;nbsp; Our workflow consists of processing CAD data from the plat maps and then loading them into the fabric page by page.&amp;nbsp; I'd be happy to discuss our process with you further if you have any questions.&amp;nbsp; It would be great to network with another municipality going through the same process.&amp;nbsp; Most are fortunate enough to have good data to load into the fabric from the get go!&amp;nbsp; &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Best,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Aaron Cole&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;GIS Tech&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;County of Nevada, California&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A href="mailto:aaron.cole@co.nevada.ca.us"&gt;aaron.cole@co.nevada.ca.us&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;(530)265-1789&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2012 15:36:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/state-local-government-questions/parce-fabric-from-step-1/m-p/309303#M1875</guid>
      <dc:creator>AaronCole1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-12-18T15:36:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

