<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Question The appropriate analysis method for this survey in Spatial Statistics Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/spatial-statistics-questions/question-the-appropriate-analysis-method-for-this/m-p/261278#M851</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Let's say that I want to see how the spatial correlation between different phenomena, which geostatistical application is best to use then? &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;One variable is the habitat and the second distribution of different plants that were collected in an area.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Do I make myself understood?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Or let say like this ...&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I have rather quantified if the conditions are good for a plant, rainfall, soil type, microclimate, geochemical conditions and so on. and produced an, admittedly somewhat arbitrary value between 1 - 10. Now I want to see how these different plants varies with the previous quantification.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;This was probably fairly accurately described. I have discussed this with colleagues and some suggest geographically weighted regression, which I also have been thinking about but which would become the explanatory and dependent on the value of such an analysis.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;GWR is perhaps not even the best approach for such an analysis???&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Grateful for answers.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Aug 2013 19:56:06 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>KimJensen</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-08-07T19:56:06Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Question The appropriate analysis method for this survey</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/spatial-statistics-questions/question-the-appropriate-analysis-method-for-this/m-p/261278#M851</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Let's say that I want to see how the spatial correlation between different phenomena, which geostatistical application is best to use then? &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;One variable is the habitat and the second distribution of different plants that were collected in an area.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Do I make myself understood?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Or let say like this ...&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I have rather quantified if the conditions are good for a plant, rainfall, soil type, microclimate, geochemical conditions and so on. and produced an, admittedly somewhat arbitrary value between 1 - 10. Now I want to see how these different plants varies with the previous quantification.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;This was probably fairly accurately described. I have discussed this with colleagues and some suggest geographically weighted regression, which I also have been thinking about but which would become the explanatory and dependent on the value of such an analysis.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;GWR is perhaps not even the best approach for such an analysis???&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Grateful for answers.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Aug 2013 19:56:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/spatial-statistics-questions/question-the-appropriate-analysis-method-for-this/m-p/261278#M851</guid>
      <dc:creator>KimJensen</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-08-07T19:56:06Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

