<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Generating a Spatial Weight Matrix using the TIME_SPACE concept in Spatial Statistics Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/spatial-statistics-questions/generating-a-spatial-weight-matrix-using-the-time/m-p/223346#M708</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Dear ESRI I have a question regarding the creation of a spatial weight matrix (SWM). I have a data set that contains 71 points depicting ozone values for two time periods (n = 142). When I create a SWM for each time period separately (i.e. independent of time) and run Moran???s I using the SWM as input I get the same results as my R Morans??? I. That is ArcGIS and R produce the same results in Morans??? I; hence, both methods must produce the same SWM. So this is a good check.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Now here is where things get interesting. When I create a SWM in ArcGIS using the concept of TIME_SPACE and run Morans???I I get different results when compared to my R program using Moran???s I. Since I have concluded that Moran???s I is calculated the same in both my R program and ArcGIS and all the parameters are set the same in ArcGIS and in R the issue must lies in the generation of the SWM under the concept TIME_SPACE. So my questions is how does ArcGIS combine the matrices generated from the 71 points over two time periods. My SWM generated in R is 142 rows by 142 columns. If I take the ArcGIS SWM convert it to a tables I get 11534 records. If my guess is true (e.g. every table record is a element in the matrix) then ArcGIS does not create a symmetrical matrix. That is the root of 11534 is 107.4&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;In simple terms how are the input matrix for the two time periods combine to create a single SWM under the TIME_SPACE concept.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Thanks&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Mike&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jan 2014 18:54:15 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>MichaelTuffly</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2014-01-15T18:54:15Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Generating a Spatial Weight Matrix using the TIME_SPACE concept</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/spatial-statistics-questions/generating-a-spatial-weight-matrix-using-the-time/m-p/223346#M708</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Dear ESRI I have a question regarding the creation of a spatial weight matrix (SWM). I have a data set that contains 71 points depicting ozone values for two time periods (n = 142). When I create a SWM for each time period separately (i.e. independent of time) and run Moran???s I using the SWM as input I get the same results as my R Morans??? I. That is ArcGIS and R produce the same results in Morans??? I; hence, both methods must produce the same SWM. So this is a good check.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Now here is where things get interesting. When I create a SWM in ArcGIS using the concept of TIME_SPACE and run Morans???I I get different results when compared to my R program using Moran???s I. Since I have concluded that Moran???s I is calculated the same in both my R program and ArcGIS and all the parameters are set the same in ArcGIS and in R the issue must lies in the generation of the SWM under the concept TIME_SPACE. So my questions is how does ArcGIS combine the matrices generated from the 71 points over two time periods. My SWM generated in R is 142 rows by 142 columns. If I take the ArcGIS SWM convert it to a tables I get 11534 records. If my guess is true (e.g. every table record is a element in the matrix) then ArcGIS does not create a symmetrical matrix. That is the root of 11534 is 107.4&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;In simple terms how are the input matrix for the two time periods combine to create a single SWM under the TIME_SPACE concept.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Thanks&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Mike&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jan 2014 18:54:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/spatial-statistics-questions/generating-a-spatial-weight-matrix-using-the-time/m-p/223346#M708</guid>
      <dc:creator>MichaelTuffly</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-01-15T18:54:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

